Voting Hillary? In for a Penny, in for a Pound.

A lot of the people voting for Hillary like to say things like:


And, hey, I can roll with that, because I believe it.  If you’re supporting a greasy, dirty person, like him, you’re taking everything that comes with him.  If you’re one of those stupid republicans, you’re helping him kill your political party.


You can cover your eyes and ears and yell “LA!LA!LA!LA!  I CAN’T HEAR YOU!  IT’S NOT TRUE!” all you want, and it changes nothing.  You own every bad thing this man says and does, because you’re endorsing him.  You can’t just endorse the things you like, because nobody in their right mind is going to listen to such a stupid argument.

HOWEVER, this is a two way street, liberals.


Yep.  You can look as stupidly surprised, all you want, but that doesn’t make you any smarter than the average Trumpanzee.  You embrace the Sea Hag,


you embrace EVERYTHING she’s said and done.

You embrace her genocidal racism.  Yep.  Hillary Clinton is a genocidal racist.  She proudly accepted an award from one of the premier genocidal White Supremacists in American history, Margaret Sanger.

Yeah, she idolizes this organization, and the founder.


OK, like the average idiot, you can cry “but Planned Parenthood has changed!”, and think everybody is stupid enough to believe what you say, but, now, we’re not, and they haven’t.

That wasn’t from very long ago.  Has Hillary Clinton repudiated this?


Oh, and if you want to divert this to the ‘health of the mother’ thing:


I’m pretty sure former Surgeon General of the United States Doctor C. Everett Koop knows more about this, than you do (and since you liberals mindlessly follow titles, his word should be law to you, right?).  I know, personally, mothers that had serious medical conditions that would be aggravated by childbirth, but guess what?  They never once thought to murder their unborn kids, for their own lives.  They committed to dying in childbirth, or not long thereafter, if necessary, to see their children born.

I guess, though, that real motherly instinct is something most liberal women lack, hence the high death rate of their children.

So that’s right:  you support race-based abortions, and the ultimate genocide of those that aren’t like you, if you’re White.

in for a penny, in for a pound
phrase of penny
  1. 1.
    used to express someone’s intention to complete an enterprise once it has been undertaken, however much time, effort, or money this entails.


And look at this leftist asshat trying to defend Clinton’s own racism:

Now, of course, being a leftist asshat, he’s trying to justify what she says, to some extent, and to try say republicans (small “r”, because they don’t deserve a capitalization) started this, but we (including this idiot) know better.  We also know that the GOP didn’t have people running around making speeches about how Black kids were “super predator” psychopaths.

  1. a person suffering from chronic mental disorder with abnormal or violent social behavior.

black thugs

I guess that if you’re not Black, and you’re a Clintonista, this is how Black families look, to you.

Now, in all fairness, Clinton “apologized” for saying that.

She’s lying.  Even leftists from TYT admitted that this was completely a racist attack on Black children that she dismisses as psychopaths that had to be “brought to heel”.  And, quite frankly, with all the time she’s been in the national slimelight, isn’t it funny how she didn’t apologize for this heartfelt 1996 address to the nation, until 2016, when she was running for president, and it got brought up?

Why wouldn’t this obviously conscientious woman not apologize, until now?  Maybe because the apology was false, and it was her truest feeling on Black People, in general. After all, isn’t this the same Hillary Clinton that was lying at the feet, adoring and admiring ARDENT racist and White Supremacist J. William Fulbright?  Fulbright wasn’t just a White Supremacist, racist nut, he was a BIG White, racist nut.

Has anyone asked Hillary Clinton if the segregationist and anti-Semite J. William Fulbright was “deplorable?” Seems like a reasonable question, since we’re playing this game. After all, her name is on the prestigious J. William Fulbright-Hillary Rodham Clinton Public Policy Fellowship.

Fulbright wasn’t just a nut with despicable ideas about minorities. He was gifted, influential politician who for decades worked to keep the races segregated through state force. He signed the Southern Manifesto (he helped edit it, actually), opposed Brown v. Board, filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and voted against the 1965 Voting Rights Act. He even voted against Hawaiian statehood to keep its large non-white population out of the union.


You want to know more?  OK.

Before leaving the spotlight, Fulbright took up another fight, going on national television in 1973 to warn Americans about the nefarious “Jewish influence” in Congress.

The Clintons have honored this man’s political legacy for a long time. The State Department only added Hillary’s name to the fellowship in 2013. Apply, and you too can help “strengthen the public sector” in other countries.

The rapidity and effectiveness in which Democrats have turned attention from Hillary’s assorted lies and corruption to Trump’s birtherism has been impressive. Of course, it’s wholly Trump’s fault that such a pivot is even possible. When you spend years peddling idiotic conspiracy theories about the president’s birth, you’ve not only proven that you’re unfit for office but that you’re probably a racist, as well.

So don’t let Trump off the hook, even if he’s changed his position — because changing your position when it’s politically convenient doesn’t erase the harm you’ve done. Even if you mean it.

Many white supremacists altered their worldview on race when it became politically expedient to do so. Maybe Hillary thinks people like Fulbright, Strom Thurmond, and one-time Klansman Robert Byrd are flawed men who deserve to be honored like George Washington or Thomas Jefferson. She had the benefit knowing them, after all. Someone should ask her.

It’s worth noting that the Clintons never shied away from appealing to the worst propensities of racist voters in Arkansas, going back to Bill Clinton giving Orval Faubus honored status at his first inauguration in Arkansas. Actually, in 2008, the Obama campaign basically accused the Clintons of peddling racism in their last-ditch attempt to dog-whistle their way to a win in South Carolina. They’ve never had to answer for any of it. They never do.

I doubt Bill or Hillary are furtive bigots; it’s just that Clintonism means taking advantage of whatever position, rhetoric, ideology, event, or person is necessary to gain power. Fulbright was the first key to that power. It was well known, if not spoken about often, that Fulbright made Bill Clinton’s career — and thus Hillary’s, as well.

And if you think the media is in the bag for the Clintons today, read this 1995 Los Angeles Times piece covering Bill’s eulogy for Fulbright. It fails to even mention the latter’s segregationist past. Actually, what am I talking about? The administration’s official bio of Fulbright’s Senate career states it “was marked by notable instances of principled dissent” yet never comes close to revealing his 30-year effort to save Jim Crow.

I do not shy away from voicing my opinion on racists (of any color, towards any color) or bigots.  They’re all bottom feeders, and the world will be a cleaner place, when they’re dead, buried and their graves desecrated.

They guy literally hated the inhabitants of Hawaii, because they weren’t White!

shocked face

The guy fought to bring back Jim Crow laws!

And this is the guy Hillary Clinton admired and clung to, until he finally did one decent thing in his life (which is die, and go to Hell).


That’s right, if you’re a Hillary loving Clintonista, you’re nothing more than a garden variety racist.  Go back to your Klan rally.  Tell ’em Robert sent ya.




And don’t get me started on economics.  While she’s talking about expanding government and adding billions to the national debt, guess where she’s going to get the money to blow on unconstitutional spending?

From the Middle Income (only leftists, like you, believe in “class” systems).

Even left-leaning says she’s lying, when she says she’s not going to blow up the budget, like any other tax-and-spend liberal.

In the final presidential debate, Hillary Clinton claimed that her proposals would “not add a penny to the debt.” But a nonpartisan budget watchdog group estimates that what she has detailed thus far would add $200 billion to the debt over 10 years.

The same budget experts estimate Trump’s proposals would add significantly more — $5.3 trillion — to the debt over 10 years. Clinton, however, made the misleading claim that Trump’s tax cuts would “add $20 trillion to the debt.” That’s a two-decade figure — a point Clinton leaves out — and it doesn’t account for any spending cuts Trump has proposed.

And these budget estimates are on top of the $9 trillion growth in the federal debt projected under current law over the next decade.

The Democratic nominee made the disputed boast about her plans a few times during the debate, telling moderator Chris Wallace at one point: “But if you look at the debt, which is the issue you asked about, Chris, I pay for everything I’m proposing. I do not add a penny to the national debt.” And in one instance, she drew the misleading comparison to Trump’s tax plan.

Clinton, Oct. 19: I also will not add a penny to the debt. I have costed out what I’m going to do. He will, through his massive tax cuts, add $20 trillion to the debt.

This isn’t the first time Clinton has claimed she would pay for all of her initiatives, and as we’ve said before, we can’t predict the future, of course. But the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget has analyzed both of the candidates’ spending and revenue proposals, finding that neither pays for everything they’ve put forth.

It’s true that Clinton comes a lot closer to paying for her spending proposals than Trump does in covering his tax cuts, according to the CRFB analysis, but she would add well more than a penny to the debt under what she has detailed thus far. CRFB estimates, updated as of Sept. 21, found that Clinton’s plans “would increase the debt by $200 billion over a decade above current law levels.” Trump’s proposals “would increase the debt by $5.3 trillion.”

Many Conservatives and Rrepublicans have said that leftists have a vested interest in keeping the poor and stupid, poor and stupid.

We’ve all heard it before. The Republicans are for the rich, the Democrats are for the poor. This, of course, ignores billionaires like George Soros, Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, Tim Cook, and Jeff Bezos who are all card-carrying leftist Democrat supporters. Ignore all that. Democrats are for the poor! Make it your mantra, because here’s the dealio: in order for the Democrats to keep being the “party for the poor,” they need people to stay poor.1

Think about it, if they’re are no poor people left to champion, then how can they keep their government programs afloat like the door Rose lays on while Jack freezes to death? If no one needs the government programs, the government programs are no longer needed. And when big government shrinks, so will the people who support the big government. It’s a vicious cycle of dependence, and it’s screwing with people’s lives and happiness. Also, Rose could’ve shared the door.

Conservatives believe in personal responsibility. It is the core of our political and cultural positions. I’m responsible for my life, my choices, both the rewards and repercussions of my choices, and I’m also responsible for my own thoughts, feelings and well-being. There’s but one captain of the Good Ship Me, and that’s me. Pirate hats look great on me, by the way.

Liberalism has a different core belief, one which subverts the individual for the role of the state and collective. Liberalism believes people as a group need to take care of each other, because individuals are selfish, greedy and hateful. The arbiter of the collective is none other than government, who “equalizes” everything with wealth redistribution to people who couldn’t (or wouldn’t) fend for themselves.

Therefore liberalism’s core belief is people are weaklings who need help. From government. The collective are a bunch of sheep, and the liberals see themselves as the watchful sheepdogs who move the collective wherever they want. Sheeple.

Democrats cannot exist without a perpetual victim class. So it’s in their best interest to keep people poor and dependent.

Yep.  That means you like to think you’re some kind of leftist elite, or, worse yet, you’re one of the poor and stupid, and you’re too stupid to realize how poor and stupid you really are, so you support someone that has basically vowed to keep you poor and stupid, for generations to come.


Yep!  That’s right!  If you’re stupid enough to vote Clinton, you’re either a victim, or a victimizer!



Hey, maybe you’re like the trumpanzees, and insist on saying that she’s changed (with just as little evidence to back it up, as the trumpanzees have).


I could say a lot more, but hopefully you’re not so stupid that you don’t get the message.

I am VIRUS-X, REPUBLIC COMMANDO, and I approve this message.



































~ by Virus-X REPUBLIC COMMANDO on October 23, 2016.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: