Communist Bernie Sanders Drops Another Lie Bomb on the Foolish and Gullible

First, let’s get the sissypants warning out of the way:

OK, Now, down to business.

SO.

Bernie Sanders drops another lie bomb on the gullible, and they’re dumb enough to believe him.

http://www.rawstory.com/2015/09/bernie-sanders-drops-truth-bomb-on-liberty-university-crowd-gop-cares-about-fetuses-but-not-children/

To sum it up:

In a speech at private Christian college Liberty University on Monday, Democratic candidate for president Sen. Bernie Sanders said that the Republican Party’s budget priorities demonstrate that while they say they want to protect unborn children, they take money away from mothers and children and give tax breaks to the wealthiest Americans.

He was responding to a question from a Liberty student who said, “Sen. Sanders, you have talked in your campaign about how it is immoral to protect the billionaire class at the expense of the most vulnerable in society — children. A majority of Christians would agree with you, but would also go further and say that children in the womb need our protection even more. How do you reconcile the two in your mind?”

“I understand that,” Sanders said, “but I do also understand this is an area where we disagree. I do understand and I do believe that it is improper for the United States government or for state government to tell every woman in this country the very painful and difficult choice that she has to make on that issue.”

“And I honestly don’t want to be too provocative here, but very often conservatives say, ‘Well, you know, get the government out of my life!’” he went on. “I don’t want the government telling me what to do.”

It’s funny that he would say that the GOP doesn’t care about children, when he, right there, just said that HE didn’t.

The liberals of the New Left wear blinders.  If they didn’t, they’d shut down like overloaded computers, trying to rationalize the stuff they believe and ignore.  The DNC came into being to deprive others of their Human Rights, and to tell the world that those that they look down upon are not Human, and do not deserve a voice.  They started this with Blacks.  Don’t believe me?  Then you’re an idiot, but go look it up, anyway.  They literally started a CIVIL WAR over the right to dehumanize, and when they lost, to this day, they claim the war wasn’t over slavery, and that only a couple of people living in the South even saw a slave.  Here’s a recap:

One idiot even said that the North SET UP the South, and somehow ARRANGED for the Southern scumbags (also known as Democrats) to fire the first shot and fully commit to high treason.

After the North kicked their asses, then they – the Democrats – continued their march for White Supremacy.  They attempted to deport all Black former slaves.  This resulted in a Michigan Republican (not a Democrat) writing the 14th Amendment.

SECTION 1

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

http://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution#

The New Left has started trying to re-interpret the Constitution to wring new and unintended meanings out of everything (including this and the Commerce Clause), but that doesn’t change the original intent.

Somewhat thwarted by the 14th Amendment, the Democrats turned to DOMESTIC TERRORISM.

The Ku Klux Klan rode across the countryside to kill anyone, Black or White, that would not bow down to their socio-political agenda of White Supremacy and political domination of the DNC (in other words, like modern democrats, they wanted a 1 party system).

http://russp.us/racism.htm

Now, it should be very clear.  The DNC (DEMOCRATS), historically, had no regard for the lives of anyone different from themselves, and considered them little more than a bottlecap, or a pair of shoes:  possessions.  De-humanized.  Many still do.  Let’s also not forget that Margaret Sanger was a democrat in good standing, spoke at Klan rallies, and was admired by Adolph Hitler.

http://www.blackgenocide.org/sanger05.html

http://margaretsangerblogspot.tumblr.com/

It’s well established that the DNC didn’t care about Black people, and still doesn’t.

Now, there’s the latter day DNC.

Do they care about children?  Even in the definition of “children” as the New Left understands it (as in, the parents deigned to let the child live long enough to make it to the nursery).

http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2014/05/03/5-ways-liberals-hurt-the-poor-n1832944/page/full

1) Overuse Of Welfare Programs: Americans are a generous people and most of us are fine with having a safety net that helps people who get down on their luck. The problem with liberals is that they do everything humanly possible to turn that safety net into a hammock. They oppose limiting the amount of time people can be on the programs along with drug testing and work requirements. Obviously, encouraging people to get comfortable on the dole is bad for the country, but it’s even worse for the people involved. It’s one thing to get in a tough spot, take assistance for a few months, and then get back on your feet. But, spending years or even decades on the dole? It’s a trap that will make you dependent on the government while utterly ruining you as a human being. There was a time when even the staunchest liberals agreed with this sentiment. Conservatives disagree with Franklin D. Roosevelt on a lot of things, but he was absolutely right when he said,

The lessons of history, confirmed by the evidence immediately before me, show conclusively that continued dependence upon relief induces a spiritual disintegration fundamentally destructive to the national fiber. To dole our relief in this way is to administer a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit. It is inimical to the dictates of a sound policy. It is in violation of the traditions of America. Work must be found for able-bodied but destitute workers.

Introduced by FDR and expanded terribly by LBJ (two of the most racist presidents, in American history:  http://www.theamericanmirror.com/the-top-five-most-racist-presidents-in-american-history/), they were marketed to the gullible public as ‘hand-ups’.  They’re not.  They’re clearly intended as ‘hand-outs’.  There are a lot of racist, white democrats (redundant, I know) that say that programs like Welfare, Social Security, etc. have benefited Blacks, and without such unconstitutional programs, Blacks would be in quite the pickle, today.  A pickle like mass unemployment, infantalization, ethnic-level lack of self respect, etc.  These two racist politicians from the DNC are the forefathers of the Welfare State, and a marvelous job their creations have been doing:

The rise of the welfare state in the 1960s contributed greatly to the demise of the black family as a stable institution. The out-of-wedlock birth rate among African Americans today is 73%, three times higher than it was prior to the War on Poverty. Children raised in fatherless homes are far more likely to grow up poor and to eventually engage in criminal behavior, than their peers who are raised in two-parent homes. In 2010, blacks (approximately 13% of the U.S. population) accounted for 48.7% of all arrests for homicide, 31.8% of arrests for forcible rape, 33.5% of arrests for aggravated assault, and 55% of arrests for robbery. Also as of 2010, the black poverty rate was 27.4% (about 3 times higher than the white rate), meaning that 11.5 million blacks in the U.S. were living in poverty.

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1672

Of course, you liberals will look at this, and say there’s no connection between A and B.

2) Supporting Illegal Immigrants Instead Of American Workers: While there are certainly Republicans who’ve been paid off by the business lobby to support illegal immigration, Democrats almost across the board are in favor of allowing as many illegal immigrants as possible into the country. If illegals were primarily taking jobs as reporters, college professors, and lawyers, liberals would ferociously oppose illegal immigration. But, since they’re taking jobs that would otherwise go to poor Americans, liberals don’t care. There are millions of poor Americans who are out of work simply because they can’t work as cheaply as an illegal immigrant who doesn’t have health care, doesn’t pay car insurance, and who can lie on his taxes with impunity. Moreover, there are millions of other poor Americans who are making a few dollars less per hour because they’re in a field full of illegal aliens who can work for less per hour because they don’t have the same costs. Few policies would do more to put poor Americans back to work than getting rid of the foreigners who are breaking the law and cheating the system in order to steal their jobs away.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/08/18/must-see-black-woman-rips-council-over-illegal-aliens/

I’m sorry, I must’ve missed in the class in macroeconomics that stated that crowding an already underemployed segment out of the population, in favor of illegal aliens, is good for the children of said underemployed. Someone remind me.

3) Fighting FOR Criminals, Not Victims: It’s a disgrace that there are Americans who can’t let their kids play in the yard out of fear of drug dealers on the corner, drive by shootings, and roaming gangs. Crime makes it harder to raise your kids, decreases property values, and stops people from moving freely around their neighborhoods. Rich and middle class Americans generally don’t have big problems with crime because they don’t have liberals “helping” them and so, they simply won’t tolerate it. So, it’s the poor Americans saddled with liberal “helpers” who suffer the most because of crime. Yet, liberals seem to spend all of their time worrying about THE CRIMINALS, not the people they’re robbing, raping, and murdering. Liberals are always fighting to get criminals out of jail, looking to change the laws to make it harder to convict people of crimes, and trying to play up conflicts between poor communities and the police. Meanwhile, the poor Americans being menaced by these criminals are living in fear and desperately searching for jobs because businesses don’t want to move into crime-ridden areas. It’s not the gang bangers, drug dealers, and cop killers who deserve sympathy from liberals; it’s the people they’re victimizing. If only liberals could understand that.

In case you’re a liberal, rocking back and forth crying “it’s not true!”, here’s an example of when Obama defended the criminal, over the victim:

President Obama’s Justice Department continues to stonewall inquiries about why it dropped a voter intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party.

The episode—which Bartle Bull, a former civil rights lawyer and publisher of the left-wing Village Voice, calls “the most blatant form of voter intimidation I’ve ever seen”—began on Election Day 2008. Mr. Bull and others witnessed two Black Panthers in paramilitary garb at a polling place near downtown Philadelphia. (Some of this behavior is on YouTube.)

One of them, they say, brandished a nightstick at the entrance and pointed it at voters and both made racial threats. Mr. Bull says he heard one yell “You are about to be ruled by the black man, cracker!”

In the first week of January, the Justice Department filed a civil lawsuit against the New Black Panther Party and three of its members, saying they violated the 1965 Voting Rights Act by scaring voters with the weapon, uniforms and racial slurs. In March, Mr. Bull submitted an affidavit at Justice’s request to support its lawsuit.

When none of the defendants filed any response to the complaint or appeared in federal district court in Philadelphia to answer the suit, it appeared almost certain Justice would have prevailed by default. Instead, the department in May suddenly allowed the party and two of the three defendants to walk away. Against the third defendant, Minister King Samir Shabazz, it sought only an injunction barring him from displaying a weapon within 100 feet of a Philadelphia polling place for the next three years—action that’s already illegal under existing law.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970203550604574361071968458430

Bet you forgot about that one.

4) Fighting To Keep Poor Americans Out Of Good Schools: Liberals have fought hard to keep poor Americans in lousy, failing schools. It certainly doesn’t have to be that way. It was George W. Bush who greatly expanded access to charter schools via No Child Left Behind, a policy that has in practice mostly benefitted poor Americans. Furthermore, it’s conservatives who support school vouchers that would enable poor Americans to send their kids to many of the same elite, private schools rich Americans choose today. On the other hand, liberals want poor kids trapped in failing schools because giving them the option to flee would take money out of the pockets of their teachers’ union allies. Liberals also fight tooth and nail to kill testing standards and keep lousy teachers in schools. Nobody who places a high value on educating our kids would do that. That’s why If you’re a poor American with a kid stuck in a terrible school system, the biggest hindrance you have to getting your child a better education is the American Left.

Let’s look specifically at how much Obama cares about children:

obama card-

When President Obama signs the $410 billion omnibus spending bill, there will be shouts of joy from both sides as Republicans and Democrats get their cherished earmarks.

Yet tucked into that bill is an amendment pushed by the president’s former colleague in the Senate, Illinois Democrat Dick Durbin, who used his influence to essentially kill the District of Columbia school vouchers program.

Oh sure, it will be portrayed that the Democrats aren’t killing the program, but the initiative calls for no new students to be allowed entry, unless approved by Congress and the District of Columbia City Council.

And considering that the teachers union has such a death grip on both Democratic-controlled institutions, you can forget about that happening.

Democrats say they believe in school choice, but they don’t fully accept the gamut of choices. They will happily tout charter schools, also opposed by the national teachers unions, but stop at vouchers.

Why? Because Republicans have consistently advocated for vouchers, and Democrats have convinced themselves that vouchers will somehow destroy the public school infrastructure.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/03/11/martin.vouchers/index.html?eref=rss_latest

Also, let’s not forget that while Michelle Obama dictates that your children should be eating spoiled dog food for lunch, hers should be dining on champagne and caviar.

http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/michelle-obama-is-furious-after-what-happened-when-this-school-dropped-her-lunch-mandates/

http://www.cnsnews.com/mrctv-blog/barbara-boland/obama-girls-enjoy-best-school-lunch-america-public-schoolers-lament-lets

5) Killing Job Opportunities For The Poor: Ronald Reagan was spot-on when he said, “The best social program is a productive job for anyone who’s willing to work.” Yet, liberals work incessantly to make it harder for poor Americans to find jobs. As the CBO confirmed, Barack Obama’s proposal to increase the minimum wage to $10.10 per hour would cost 500,000 jobs. In D.C. big box stores like Wal-Mart were targeted with a new law that would force the companies to pay 50% above the minimum wage. As a result, Wal-Mart decided not to build six stores in an area which cost thousands of people much needed jobs. Because of Barack Obama’s liberal policies, there are actually a million less Americans working today than there were the day he took officeeven though our nation’s population has grown by almost six million people. Since the poor have less experience and fewer job skills, Obama’s job-killing policies are tougher on them than any other group of Americans. We need to do everything possible to make it easier and more likely that businesses will hire poor Americans, not set up even more policies that keep them from getting jobs.

Well, that certainly doesn’t sound like the policies of people that care about children (especially Black ones).

Young people are being chased out of the labor market. Though the national unemployment rate has fallen steadily in recent months, youth unemployment remains stubbornly high, and the jobless rate is even higher among young minorities. For young people between the ages of 16 and 24, unemployment is more than twice the national rate, at 14.2 percent. For African-Americans, that rate jumps to 21.4 percent.

Of course, discrimination could be a factor. But according to William Spriggs, an economist at Howard University, the trend is also being driven by a sluggish economy. As he toldMorning Edition’s Renee Montagne, there is still a backlog of Americans who are unemployed or underemployed as a result of the Great Recession, creating more competition for even minimum wage jobs. In a job market where many people with a college education are settling for jobs outside of their fields, a teenager looking for a summer job will find the market crowded.

http://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2014/07/21/329864863/the-youth-unemployment-crisis-hits-african-americans-hardest

http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2014/05/03/5-ways-liberals-hurt-the-poor-n1832944/page/full

And what about the Republicans?  Well, first off, they’re the ones that beat you democrats down, in the first place, to end your slavery practice.  They fought for years and years against the leftists to get civil rights instituted in the United States, and break DNC institutionalized racism and bigotry.

January 1st, 1863, the Emancipation Proclamation has been issued in 1862. January 1, 1863, it starts. And they begin to implement the Republicans Confiscation Act of 1862. The Democratic party continues to support slavery. February 9th, 1864, Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Stanton deliver over 100,000 signatures to US Senate supporting — when you think — when you hear those two names. Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Stanton, which party do you think of? It’s women’s rights. Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton deliver over 100,000 signatures to the U.S. Senate supporting the Republican plan for the constitutional amendment to ban slavery.

June 15, 1864, Republican Congress votes for equal pay for African-American troops serving in the U.S. Army. June 28, 1864, Republican majority in Congress repeals the Fugitive Slave Act. October 29, 1864, African-Americans abolitionist, Sojourner HEP Truth says to President Lincoln, I was never treated by anyone with more kindness than he has shown me. January 31st, 1865, the Thirteenth Amendment banning slavery passed the US House with unanimous Republican support and intense Democratic opposition. The Republican support, 100 percent. The Democratic party support, 23 percent.

http://www.glennbeck.com/2015/04/28/the-real-history-of-the-civil-rights-movement/?utm_source=glennbeck&utm_medium=contentcopy_link

What else do those uncaring Republicans have to say about children?

We must decrease abuse caseloads and increase accountability in the child protection system. We propose to restructure that system by combining the separate and competing funding sources into a Child Protection Block Grant with guaranteed levels of funding. We call for the stringent enforcement of laws against the abuse of children. Government should work with faith-based groups that provide adoption services. We call for local efforts to help the children of prisoners.

http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Republican_Party_Families_+_Children.htm

Individual examples?  Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann.

Knowing her child was going to be born with significant learning impairments and physical handicaps, instead of opting to murder him in the womb, Sarah Palin is raising this child, today, and loving him.

Michelle Bachmann?  Read for yourself.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/did-michele-bachmann-raise-23-foster-kids/

Republican policies?

Who was the first black president?

Two decades before the election of Barack Obama, novelist Toni Morrisondubbed Bill Clinton “our first black president.” She even said that Clinton was “blacker than any actual black person who could ever be elected in our children’s lifetime.”

Well, I could make an even stronger case for my father, Ronald Reagan, as “our first black president.”—but I won’t make that claim. I don’t want to diminish the justifiable pride African-Americans take in having a president who is genetically and culturally black. Our first black President is Barack Obama.

But the past two years have made one thing clear: Ronald Reagan was a far better friend to black Americans than Barack Obama has been. Just compare the Reagan and Obama records. Under Obama, black unemployment rose from 12.6 percent in January 2009 to 16.0 percent today. This means that black unemployment has increased by more than one-fourth since Obama took office.

And the Reagan record? African-American columnist Joseph Perkins has studied the effects of Reaganomics on black America. He found that, after the Reagan tax cuts gained traction, African-American unemployment fell from 19.5 percent in 1983 to 11.4 percent in 1989. Black-owned businesses saw income rise from $12.4 billion in 1982 to $18.1 billion in 1987—an annual average growth rate of 7.9 percent. The black middle class expanded by one-third during the Reagan years, from 3.6 million to 4.8 million.

Before he was elected, in speech after speech, my father said that his economic plan would improve the lives of African-Americans. In a February 1977 CPAC address, he said, “The time has come for Republicans to say to black voters: ‘We offer principles that black Americans can and do support. We believe in jobs, real jobs; we believe in education that is really education; we believe in treating all Americans as individuals and not as stereotypes or voting blocs.'”

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2011/01/17/michael-reagan-ronald-reagan-friend-blacks-obama.html

Common sense says that a family that has more money in it’s pockets will have more money to take care of their children with, as opposed to those with less money in their pockets (such as today, under Obamanomics).

The bottom line is that, while no political party is composed of perfect people, chasing after perfect ideals/ideology, the DNC is much further from perfect, than the GOP, and Bernie Sander’s communist party is further away, still.  He represents the soviet socialist system, that had free food.

Millions of Soviets on Bread Line, Pravda Reports

March 25, 1989|From Reuters
MOSCOW — Millions of Soviet citizens live on the bread line with totally inadequate wages or pensions, the Communist Party newspaper Pravda reported Friday.

“We write very rarely about poor people–pensioners, labor veterans and invalids living on low incomes, about young families living from hand to mouth–yet there are very many of them in our country,” the newspaper said.

Fifteen million people in the Soviet Union live on a pension of less than $97 a month, it added.

Pravda quoted a letter from a war veteran on a $92 monthly pension who complained she had seen little sign of Kremlin leader Mikhail S. Gorbachev’s reform plans.

“In recent times they talk a lot about perestroika, (restructuring) but for us pensioners, life has become many times worse,” she wrote. “In the evening, when no one is watching, I go to the garbage cans to see if someone has thrown away any old shoes.”

http://articles.latimes.com/1989-03-25/news/mn-475_1_bread-line

Yeah, I’m sure that was good for the children.  Couple that with Sander’s love of murder on demand of the most helpless people in society (http://www.lifenews.com/2015/09/14/bernie-sanders-defends-abortion-at-christian-university-says-america-founded-on-racist-principles/), and you’ve got a serious love fest going on.

I am Virus-X:  Republic Commando, and I approve this message.

great seal of virus x

Advertisements

~ by virusx on September 15, 2015.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: