George Takai: Still Trying to Be Something He’s Not: RELEVANT.

Well, George Takei is at it, again.  He has to insert himself into situations, so he can try maintaining what little celebrity he can keep his hands on.  So, this left wing imbecile has yet another asinine meme to try to get people to think about him.

Wow. Amazingly, leftists look upon racist scumbag George Takai as some kind of hero.

CONSERVATIVE DAILY BRIEF george takei racist

He’s so confused, he doesn’t even like people that’ve gotten sex change operations. The guy’s probably never read the Constitution, but he seems to think that a county clerk took an oath based on the US Constitution.  Or maybe he’s thinking the state’s constitution, which I also doubt he’s ever read, much less even seen on the Internet.

Like a lot of leftists of his ilk, he lies, and he can’t help it.

The court order is the “Supreme” Court’s ruling that gay marriage is “legal” throughout the United States.

This is further evidence that he doesn’t know what he’s talking about, and probably only talks so he can hear his head roar.  If he had a brain in his head, he’d know that the “Supreme” Court had no authority to render such a ruling, and that such a ruling is null and void.

Why do I say that?

This is why:

The “Supreme” Court is covered by Article 3 of the Constitution, and here it is:

Article III.

Section. 1.

The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.

Section. 2.

The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;—to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;—to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;—to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;—to Controversies between two or more States;— between a State and Citizens of another State,—between Citizens of different States,—between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.

In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.

The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed.

Section. 3.

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html

Let’s look at those enumerated powers, again, shall we?:

Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;—to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;—to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;—to Controversies between two or more States;— between a State and Citizens of another State,—between Citizens of different States,—between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.

In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.

No mention of the authority to even HEAR cases regarding ANY KIND of marriage, is there?  Of course, if you’re a liberal, that means you have selective vision.  That means you can see whatever you want to see, and don’t see what you don’t want to see.

The law that these idiots pointed toward – the 14th Amendment – was very clear, and if it wasn’t, they could’ve looked it up.

http://conservativetribune.com/man-wrote-14th-amendment/

See how easy that was?  Look, I’ll do it, again.

Leftist haters like Takai…

Haterade

…and his fans are willing to go along with the lawless decisions of this out of control, kangaroo court, because it renders unethical, unconstitutional and illegal decisions that go along with the New Left Orthodoxy.  Had it gone the other way, they’d be protesting, and saying it was wrong.  Remember when a gay judge unconstitutionally overturned the will of the people in California, over Proposition 8?  Leftists claimed they wanted law and order, until it was voted down.  Then they trotted out a crooked judge (who violated his oath, and Takai had no problem with that) and broke the law (which he had no problem with, either).

So, this clerk didn’t disobey a valid court order, because it came from a court that had no authority to even hear the case, much less make a ruling on it.  And violate the Constitution?  What clause?  What amendment?

None.

Takei claims he believes she’s entitled to have her beliefs, and yet we all know he’s lying, because of his past attacks on anyone that tried protecting 1st Amendment rights for people to hold the very beliefs he claims to be supportive of.

http://www.indystar.com/story/news/2015/03/26/george-takei-says-hell-encourage-gen-con-to-move-convention-out-of-indianapolis/70483988/

http://www.inquisitr.com/1146607/george-takei-threatens-to-boycott-arizona/

Doesn’t sound like he believes people should be able to exercise religious liberty, to me.  In fact, he just sounds like yet another leftist that says their rights trump everybody elses’.  Their right to demand service outweighs your right to demand service.  While you have to bake them cakes and support their ceremonies, they don’t even have to do their jobs and perform marriages.

http://redrocktribune.com/gay-judge-refuses-to-marry-straight-christian-couples/

Funny, I don’t see Mr. Law and Order Gay complaining about this.

That’s because he’s OK with it.

He says that the clerk, in not personally issuing licenses to gays trying to marry in the county, was imposing her beliefs on others.  That’s really funny, coming from a gay democrat.  Democrats have been trying to erode 1st Amendment rights, and totally wipe away 2nd Amendment rights.  He thinks it’s OK to force someone to serve in a position that they morally object to, because he doesn’t care about their morals, nor have any, himself.  He thinks it’s OK to destroy peoples’ lives, if they don’t comply with their demands.

But don’t worry.  This isn’t forcing their beliefs on others.

He can try making this a race issue, saying that she wouldn’t have been hailed as a hero, had she done this to an inter-ethnic couple (there’s no thing as “inter-racial”; science loving liberals won’t acknowledge that there’s only one race of Human on this planet, and the Human Genome Project proved that DECADES ago: http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=9581), but let’s not forget that Takei is a racist scumbag, himself, as are many of his worthless fans.

Takei claims the clerk was obeying religious law.

Well, guess what?

The 1st Amendment gives her that right.

By the way, is this jackass calling for boycotts of Muslim businesses?

http://libertyunyielding.com/2014/03/02/muslim-barber-refuses-cut-hair-lesbian-whose-rights-trump-whose/

Obeying any other law is irrelevant, because there was no law stating that gay marriage was legal in that state.  It was a diktat from the “Supreme” Court.  He tries bringing words like “un-American” into this, but can you get more un-American, than George Takei?  A racist scumbag that worships the rulings of the illegitimate “Supreme” Court.  The same court that said slavery was legal, segregation was legal, that it was legal to chase escaped slaves across the country, and that it was legal to put people like him into concentration camps, because he had yellow skin and slanted eyes.  But, really, would would you expect from someone that’s so stupid that they still vote Democrat, after being locked in a concentration camp for being Japanese in America?

http://io9.com/george-takei-describes-his-experience-in-a-japanese-int-1533358984

I am Virus-X, Republic Commando, and I approve this message.

great seal of virus x

Advertisements

~ by virusx on September 11, 2015.

3 Responses to “George Takai: Still Trying to Be Something He’s Not: RELEVANT.”

  1. Cry your tears, sunshine. Takei is one of the most followed people on Facebook. He’s about to open a major play on Broadway. Plus, he’s cheered by thousands at any event he attends. You can “have a sad,” but facts are facts.

  2. Then have fun with him. I didn’t tell anyone not to. I expressed why I won’t, and if you can’t take that, that’s tough. Now go back to your show tunes, Cupcake.

  3. Oh, and by the way, Sugarplumb, just remember that you had the chance to address the constitutionality of my argument, or even make an attempt to refute his blatant racism. You didn’t. Instead, you chose to talk about Broadway plays that may, or may not, amount to anything, and about how I’m helpless to stop something completely irrelevant to anything I discussed. That just leads me to believe you are an uneducated, racist, left-wing neanderthal, just like he is.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: