The ZEROES and the HERO

CONSERVATIVE DAILY BRIEF proto-black-clinton obama disarm troops sailo charged

Being interested in truth, I actually looked.  Now, a lot of people have heard that it was William Jefferson Clinton that was first responsible for disallowing American military personnel from the right to 2nd Amendment protection, but, it turns out, it was not.  No, this was, apparently, the brainchild of Donald J. Atwood, Deputy Secretary of Defense under George H.W. Bush.

A. REISSUANCE AND PURPOSE This Directive: 1. Reissues reference (a), replaces reference (b), and consolidates policy and procedures for the carrying of firearms and use of deadly force by DoD military and civilian personnel engaged in law enforcement or security duties. 2. Implements the provisions of reference (c) that govern the carrying of firearms by civilian DoD personnel performing law enforcement and security duties, and references (d) and (e) that apply to the carrying of firearms by DoD military and civilian personnel aboard commercial aircraft.

B. APPLICABILITY AND SCOPE This Directive: 1. Applies to the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), the Military Departments, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Joint Staff, the Unified and Specified Commands, the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, the Defense Agencies, and the DoD Field Activities (hereafter referred to collectively as “the DoD Components”). The term “Military Services,” as used herein, refers to the Army, the Navy, the Air Force, and the Marine Corps.

It’s funny that leftist Wikipedia, while listing his illustrious accomplishments, doesn’t list this one, which cost so many American lives.

Now, I know that in the military, they expect you to (unconstitutionally) give up some rights.  For instance, you cannot be openly and publicly critical of people like Obama, no matter how despicable a person they may be (like Obama).

obama the tyrant

You cannot do that to Commander in Chief, you can’t do that to the Secretary of Defense, you can’t do that about anybody in your chain of command, period.  However, with the stroke of a pen, this petty bureaucrat – with the full cooperation of President George H.W. Bush literally deprived American Servicemen of the Right to Life.

Know who else it affected?  These people, for a start:

Michael Grant Cahill[71] 62 Spokane, Washington Civilian Physician Assistant Shot while trying to charge the shooter[51]
Libardo Eduardo Caraveo[72] 52 Woodbridge, Virginia Major
Justin Michael DeCrow[73][74] 32 Plymouth, Indiana Staff Sergeant Shot in the chest
John P. Gaffaney[75] 56 Serra Mesa, California Captain[76] Shot while trying to charge the shooter[27]
Frederick Greene[71] 29 Mountain City, Tennessee Specialist Shot while trying to charge the shooter[77]
Jason Dean Hunt[71][78] 22 Tipton, Oklahoma Specialist Shot in the back
Amy Sue Krueger[71][79] 29 Kiel, Wisconsin Staff Sergeant Shot in the chest
Aaron Thomas Nemelka[71][80] 19 West Jordan, Utah Private First Class Shot in the chest
Michael S. Pearson[71][81] 22 Bolingbrook, Illinois Private First Class Shot in the chest
Russell Gilbert Seager[82] 51 Racine, Wisconsin Captain[83]
Francheska Velez[79][84] 21 Chicago, Illinois Private First Class Shot in the chest. Was pregnant when killed, and the baby also died.[85]
Juanita L. Warman[82][86] 55 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Lieutenant Colonel[87] Shot in the abdomen
Kham See Xiong[71][88] 23 Saint Paul, Minnesota Private First Class Shot in the head

These people DIED.  They are DEAD, and CAN’T COME BACK, until they’re FOLLOWING YESHUA in the RESURRECTION, thanks to this stupid, thoughtless policy that Barack Obama has decided to expand to the rest of the public.  Then, there’s these people:

1 James Armstrong[89][90]:60, ¶129 Specialist Shot in the leg
2 Patrick Blue III[91] Sergeant Not shot, but hit in the side by bullet fragments
3 Keara Bono Torkelson[92][93] Specialist Shot in the shoulder and grazed in the head
4 Logan M. Burnett[90]:61, ¶131 [91] Specialist Shot in the hip, left elbow, and hand
5 Alan Carroll[94] Specialist Shot in the upper right arm, right bicep, left side of back, and left leg
6 Dorothy Carskadon[90]:61, ¶132 [91] Captain Shot in the leg, hip, and stomach, and grazed on the forehead; permanently disabled.
7 Joy Clark[95] Staff Sergeant Shot in the forearm
8 Matthew D. Cooke[90]:62, ¶133[96] Specialist
9 Chad Davis[97] Staff Sergeant Shot in the shoulder
10 Mick Engnehl[90]:62, ¶134[98] Private Shot in the shoulder and grazed in the neck
11 Joseph T. Foster[90]:63, ¶135[99] Private Shot in the hip
12 Amber Gadlin (formerly Amber Bahr)[89][90]:63, ¶136[100] Private
13 Nathan Hewitt[90]:63, ¶137[91] Sergeant Shot twice in the leg
14 Alvin Howard[89] Sergeant Shot in the left shoulder
15 Najee M. Hull[90]:63, ¶138[94] Private Shot once in the knee and twice in the back
16 Eric Williams Jackson[101] Staff Sergeant Shot in the right arm
17 Justin T. Johnson[90]:64, ¶139[102] Private Shot once in the foot and twice in the back
18 Alonzo M. Lunsford, Jr[89][103] Staff Sergeant Grazed in the head, and shot twice in the stomach
19 Shawn N. Manning[90]:63, ¶141[104] Staff Sergeant Grazed in the lower right side, and shot in the left upper chest, left back, lower right thigh, upper right thigh, and right foot
20 Paul Martin[95] Staff Sergeant Shot in the arm, leg, and back
21 Brandy Mason[94] 2nd Lieutenant Shot in the hip
22 Grant Moxon[91] Specialist Shot in the leg
23 Kimberly Munley[90]:72, ¶157[96] Civilian Police Sergeant Shot twice in the leg
24 John Pagel[105] Specialist Shot through his left arm; bullet traveled into left side of his chest
25 Dayna Ferguson Roscoe[90]:66, ¶142[106] Specialist Shot in the arm, shoulder, and thigh
26 Christopher H. Royal[90]:66, ¶143[91] Chief Warrant Officer Started a nonprofit foundation called “32 Still Standing” to raise money to support the survivors.[107]
27 Randy Royer[108] Major Shot in the arm and leg
28 Jonathan Sims[90]:66, ¶144[109] Specialist Shot in the chest, back
29 George O. Stratton, III[90]:67, ¶145[91] Specialist Shot in the shoulder
30 Patrick Zeigler[95] Staff Sergeant Shot in the left shoulder, left forearm, left hip, and left side of head
31 Miguel A. Valdivia[90]:67, ¶146[110] Sergeant Shot in the right thigh and left hip
32 Thuan Nguyen[101] Staff Sergeant Shot in the thigh

Am I saying that the presence of armed Soldiers (and, yes, Soldier is spelled with a capital “S”, you illiterates,,13190,122303_Soldier,00.html) would’ve necessarily prevented that terrorist attack from happening (and, yes, it was a terrorist attack, not “workplace violence”, like Obama wants to call it:

No, I am not.

What I am saying is that after shooting maybe 2 or 3 people, he would’ve given his position away, and, being a demonically possessed Muslim, he probably would’ve held his ground.  That would’ve been great, because a lot of armed, pissed-off Soldiers would’ve been able to target, draw and fire on him, sending one HELL of a lot of hot lead heading back his way. That way, he would’ve gotten to meet his maker, a lot sooner,

satan time magazine cover.p

as well as get his ration of virgins.

islam virgins-86020006416

Part of the ongoing problem is political generals, like Ray Odierno, 4-star ass-kisser under the Obama Regime.

I like liberal hair.

I like liberal hair.

In an exclusive interview with Fox News, Army Chief of Staff Gen. Raymond T. Odierno, who is set to retire as Army chief in August, clarified remarks he made in the wake of the Chattanooga shootings which left four Marines and one sailor dead. 

He says the Army is in fact considering whether to arm recruiters if the legal restrictions are lifted. 

“When it comes to recruiting stations, we are looking at it now — what are we doing now to best protect them,” Odierno said in a sit-down interview as he prepared to leave the Army after 39 years of service. “We will look at every avenue — arming them, there is some authority issues with that so we have to look all the way through that.” 

He says his remarks on Friday were misunderstood. On Friday, Odierno told reporters he was reluctant to arm soldiers on every base in the U.S., a position that led to criticism. He had said, “We have to be careful about over-arming ourselves,” when asked about any plans to arm more soldiers at bases. 

Odierno clarified to Fox News, “What got confused was another question asked to me, ‘Do you think we should arm all our soldiers on all our installations.’ That I have a problem with.” 

He says he was not referring to recruiters in his original remarks.

I guess, maybe, he’s too busy playing with Colbert’s hair (a left wing clown that is no friend of the Constitution), and not really living up to his job of watching over the Army (as well as the Navy and Air Force, considering he is the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff).  If this is due to a belief that Soldiers and Marines are ‘too immature’ to be trusted, domestically, with weapons, unless they’re on duty (like Military Police, who also can’t carry off duty, so if they see trouble and they’re not officially on the clock, you’re in trouble), that’s a failing on Odierno’s part, as well as the rest of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Obama, himself, who – though he doesn’t deserve the title – is the CinC.


If the forces are not ‘mature’ enough to carry weapons, then they should’ve changed recruiting standards.  A LONG TIME AGO, and that includes BUSH.  

Furthermore, I guess they don’t realize how stupid they sound, when they say these kinds of things (or just don’t care).

So let me get this straight:  our young Soldiers and Marines (and Sailors and Airmen, too) are old and mature enough to go overseas and fight al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and the Iranian Quds Force, and earn the US military a reputation as being the most respected institution during the George W. Bush Administration (, but they’re not mature enough to be trusted, in CONUS.

See how stupid that sounds?

I’ll bet you even felt stupid, just reading it.

And, now, we have a Sailor of good repute – far better in reputation his CinC, Obama – being CRIMINALLY CHARGED by the DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, for the dire crime of firing an unauthorized weapon on property controlled by the most tyrannical president America has ever been stupid enough to elect, all in an attempt to save the lives of fellow servicemen, from a DERANGED MUSLIM TERRORIST.

A Navy officer and a Marine fired their sidearms hoping to kill or subdue the gunman who murdered five service members last week in Chattanooga, Tennessee, according to multiple military officials familiar with internal reporting on the tragedy.

It remains unclear whether either hit Muhammad Abdulazeez, who was shot and killed on July 16 after he gunned down four Marines and a sailor at the Navy Operational Support Center in Chattanooga. It’s also unclear why they were armed, as it is against Defense Department policy for anyone other than military police or law enforcement to carry weapons on federal property.

A report distributed among senior Navy leaders during the shooting’s aftermath said Lt. Cmdr. Timothy White, the support center’s commanding officer, used his personal firearm to engage Abdulazeez, Navy Times confirmed with four separate sources. A Navy official also confirmed a Washington Post report indicating one of the slain Marines may have been carrying a 9mm Glock and possibly returned fire on the gunman.

From LTC Allen West (ret.):

Ladies and gents, resulting from the text message I received yesterday, I can confirm that the United States Navy is bringing charges against Lt. Cmdr Timothy White for illegally discharging a firearm on federal property.

The text message asked if it would be possible for Lt.Cmdr White to reach out to me. To wit I replied, affirmative.

What kind of freaking idiots are in charge of our Armed Forces — pardon me, our “unArmed Forces”? What would they prefer that Abdulazeez had been able to kill all the Marines and Sailors at the Naval Support Reserve Center? Let me draw an interesting contrast: Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus is more concerned about lifting the ban on transgendered Sailors. Mabus has a problem in that for the first time since 2007 the US Navy will not have a Carrier Battle Group operating in the Persian Gulf. But this knucklehead has no problem with the Navy seeking to destroy the career of a Sailor, a commander of an installation, returning fire against an Islamic jihadist attack. I do not care if it was his personal weapon, he deserves a medal for facing the enemy.

Folks, this has become the Obama military that will not implement policies for our men and women in uniform to be protected — but will punish them if they do protect themselves. What ever happened to the Navy of John Paul Jones, Farragut, Halsey, and Nimitz? What has happened in our America where we believe that our men and women in uniform — especially the commanders — are just targets for these damn Islamic jihadists?

What more can be said?  If you want to help the people that keep you alive, then you’re going to have to do a better job during elections, and not just the presidential ones, but Congressional, as well.  When you elect politicians that don’t care about anyone, but themselves, and the amount of money, power and influence they can accumulate, thanks to the snazzy title you gave them, you’re part of the problem.  Start communicating with these people, and investigate them, before you elect them.

And, most of all, STOP VOTING DEMOCRAT.

This magnitude of stupidity in this storyline speaks for itself, so I shouldn’t have to say much.  DC Comics (and Marvel) has been invaded by New Left nogoodniks that have no other mission, than to indoctrinate children into their twisted way of thinking, and to perpetuate the New Left narrative.  The latest casualty of their contribution to the Culture War is now Superman.

superman black lives protester

Superman, now and officially – besides being an illegal alien – is a violent Black Lives Matters protester, as of Action Comics #42.

The new issue comes from the minds of Greg Pak and Aaron Kuder, who have imagined a much darker story for arguably the world’s most iconic superhero. The comic has been making waves for its controversial theme as the parallels to the riots in Ferguson and St. Louis are impossible to ignore.

In the issue, Clark Kent’s secret identity has been revealed, he has been stripped of most of his powers and he’s ditched his tights. Instead, Kent wears just a T-shirt and jeans, along with tatters of his Superman cape over his fists.

The downtrodden hero returns to a town that is fearful of him. Although a group of his supporters decide to celebrate his return, the police department soon arrives to break up the party. One of his supporters gets unruly, the police get angry, and before long, a full blown riot breaks out. The comic ends with Superman punching a police officer in the face.

Obviously, two things were/are at play, here:

1:  The Superman must not be doing as well as they would try to have people believe, even with the success of the last reboot movie (and the umpteenth reboot of the comic series).

2:  As with the MAX Comics “Punisher”, DC has just totally given it over to the New Left.  “Truth, Justice and the American Way” have a different meaning to leftists, who are seemingly preoccupied with lies, injustice and fundamentally transforming America.

There are so many things wrong with this, it’s almost impossible to go into them all, and I’m not about to take the time (HOURS) out to attempt it, so I’ll just try bullet-pointing it.

  • Leftists don’t like police officers, or anybody else involved in law enforcement.  Sure, there are bad applies in the law enforcement field.  I’ve encountered civilian scum that shouldn’t be wearing the uniform, and I’ve worked alongside scum that dishonored the uniform of the Military Police, for certain, but these have been exceptions, not rules.  A common tactic of the left is to try exemplifying people like this, falsely portraying them as the majority, when they are not, all while simultaneously trying to hide the people on their side, and their multiple crimes, and to portray what they do as either having not happened, or being “isolated” instances.  Now that the New Left has made another major break into the comic realm (as they also did in the new “Supergirl” series, which I will not watch, EVER), the first item on their agenda is to demonize the police, using Superman as their newest false prophet and messiah.
  • This is a clear and blatant full court press by DC Comics to alter the way their readers think and perceive reality, through populist bull**itting.  The case with Trayvon Martin was a convoluted lie that the New Left came up with, saying he was just a doe-eyed urchin that just wanted some tea and Skittles for his innocent, little sweet tooth.  The case with Mike Brown was a lie about a gentle giant that wouldn’t hurt a fly, but was murdered in cold blood by a mean ‘ol police officer.  Et-cetera.  Now, thanks to DC Comics, Superman will show the whole world how downtrodden American blacks really are (and never mind that half-black mulatto “occupying” the White House).

  • This is also, quite clearly, an effort to turn wrong into right.  “Black Lives Matter” has pushed a false narrative, since it’s beginning as a stupid meme, and it continues.  They will not countenance the fact that White lives matter, Asian lives matter, Latino lives matter, police lives matter, military lives matter, or anyone else that can’t further their own political agenda.  Another example of the wrong is right mentality?  From the description:  Although a group of his supporters decide to celebrate his return, the police department soon arrives to break up the party. One of his supporters gets unruly, the police get angry, and before long, a full blown riot breaks out. The comic ends with Superman punching a police officer in the face.  Broken down, 1:  “…a group of his supporters decide to celebrate his return…”, Superman comes back to town, and a bunch of people that support his brand of justice stage an impromptu get-together, which might not have been done in a legal fashion.  2:  “…the police department soon arrives to break up the party.”  Quite probably, this could’ve involved committing crimes like trespassing, destruction of private or pubic property, or disturbing the peace.  3:  “One of his supporters gets unruly, the police get angry”  Translation:  the New Left writers of this perfectly asinine story line portray the police as the Fun Police, a “supporter” (i.e.:  BLACK GUY) gets mad about it, and, quite probably disrespectful and disorderly, heaping what is probably verbal abuse on the police (which leftists believe the police are supposed to happily take).  This probably goes in one of two ways:  the police try making a justified arrest that may go bad, or the New Left goes all out in portraying the police as racist thugs (which most – if not all – Black Lives Matters protesters, in reality, are).    4:  “…and before long, a full blown riot breaks out. The comic ends with Superman punching a police officer in the face.”  Translation, the rest of the crowd is revealed as being nothing more than a pack of violent thugs that have utter and complete disrespect for authority, and follow Superman because he is defiant of authority.  To show how little respect they have for the laws of the land and law enforcement, they engage in a mass criminal action, engineered to hurt people and destroy property, in the course of their temper tantrum, and in the height of all this, there’s Superman:  an illegal alien that thinks he’s superior to others, by virtue of his superhuman powers, and as a consequence of the poor moral upbringing of his adoptive parents – the Kents (who are probably Obama supporters, themselves, though he clearly despises White people, especially those living in rural neighborhoods).  Superman decides to join the lawless masses and commit assault with intent to commit murder against a police officer, just to get in good with his ‘new, Black friends’.


If I was Henry Cavil, I’d be pissed and worried.  First of all, the upcoming Superman v Batman movie story is looking pretty stupid, and has had some really bad casting choices, with Affleck as Batman.  These [bad writing and casting] could adversely affect success.  Now, this.  People with some common sense and decency might not like this, and it could have a backlash, not only against this worthless comic book and comic book company, but against the upcoming movie, considering this character change occurs before the release of the movie.

Stupid, on all counts.

Read more:

great seal of virus x


~ by Virus-X REPUBLIC COMMANDO on August 1, 2015.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: