Dealing with Rogue “Supreme” Court “Justices”

http://therightscoop.com/the-judges-are-not-above-the-people-ted-cruz-proposes-constitutional-amendment-to-reel-in-supremes/

ted cruz for president townhall cover -

I’m sure Ted Cruz would agree with my ancestor that said these words:

“How strangely will the Tools of a Tyrant pervert the plain Meaning of Words!”

The “Supreme” Court violated the Constitution in just HEARING the case [gay “marriage”], the “Supreme” Court violated the Constitution in rendering a verdict, and the “Supreme” Court violated the Constitution in thinking to force this decision on the States, against the States’ own rights. The saw some words in the Constitution, said “Hey, this looks like something we can use”, then twisted very clear and plain words to mean something they did not.

I don’t think elections are needed. People elect politicians like Obama, so that says everything, right there. What they need is an audit. A regularized performance evaluation.  They do not have lifetime appointments, really, because their appointments, according to the Constitution, is contingent upon Article 3, Section 1:

“The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behavior, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services a Compensation which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.”

While the Constitution is clear that the “Supreme” Court must remain, lower courts can be removed, and later reestablished, or completely replaced. Lower federal courts found to have a track record of rendering verdicts that are unconstitutional should be dissolved. Judges and prosecutors that are found rendering those verdicts should be impeached and discharged from government service, and blocked from holding any position with the federal government, ever again.

“Supreme” Court judges should be subject to the same review that Non-Commissioned Officers and Commissioned Officers of the US Army are made to undergo (the NCOER [Non-Commissioned Officer Evaluation Report] and the OER [Officer Evaluation Report]). These should be conducted by an independent contractor (a “Ken Starr”), or by the President of the United States, himself. Again, a history of judicial activism, or siding with unconstitutional verdicts (such as immanent domain, abortion, gay “marriage”, violations of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, etc.) should spell immediately being served with paperwork notifying them of automatic, mandatory impeachment.

Batman-Slapping-Robin supreme court

Resignation should not be an option to evade punishment. This would also mean that if you’re not a “constitutional originalist”, you’re guaranteed impeachment, for not going by the original, documented intent of the wording and intent of the law.

(Can a federal judge be fired? Justices and judges appointed under Article III of the Constitution (Supreme Court justices, appellate and district court judges, and Court of International Trade judges) serve “during good behavior.” That means they may keep their jobs unless Congress decides to remove them through a lengthy process called impeachment and conviction. Congress has found it necessary to use this process only a few times in the history of our country. From a practical standpoint, almost all of these judges hold office for as long as they wish. Article III also prohibits lowering the salaries of federal judges “during their continuance in office.” Bankruptcy judges, in contrast, may be removed from office by circuit judicial councils, and magistrate judges may be removed by the district judges of the magistrate judge’s circuit. Bankruptcy judges and magistrate judges don’t have the same protections (lifetime appointment and no reduction in salary) as judges appointed under Article III of the Constitution.
http://www.fjc.gov/federal/cou…

A law should be passed to make sure this is mandatory, and the teeth of the law should be any Congressman that does not cooperate with this process unfolding, and attempts to impede it by preventing the impeachment from happening (such as how Nancy Pelosi…

princess pelosi card

…unconstitutionally took it upon herself to block Representatives from even voting on things she didn’t want to see pass), would result in a federal Class 3 felony. This would also trigger the Attorney General to immediately seek a warrant for the arrest of said politician on charges of obstruction of justice and either aiding and abetting, or being an accessory after the fact. That arrest warrant would be served by deputies of the United States Marshals Service. The appropriate House of Congress would also be compelled to vote to remove or retain said politician from that body, immediately. Obstructing that vote would be punished identically to obstructing the mandatory impeachment vote.  (Oh, and just voting “nay”, when the President wants a “yea” is not grounds for having the deputies come after you.)

Advertisements

~ by virusx on June 28, 2015.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: