Sun Tzu says:

Sun Tzu says:
I. Laying Plans
Now the general who wins a battle makes many calculations in his temple ere the battle is fought. The general who loses a battle makes but few calculations beforehand. Thus do many calculations lead to victory, and few calculations to defeat: how much more no calculation at all! It is by attention to this point that I can foresee who is likely to win or lose.

III. Attack by Stratagem
2. Hence to fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy’s resistance without fighting.

3. Thus the highest form of generalship is to balk the enemy’s plans; the next best is to prevent the junction of the enemy’s forces; the next in order is to attack the enemy’s army in the field; and the worst policy of all is to besiege walled cities.

4. The rule is, not to besiege walled cities if it can possibly be avoided. The preparation of mantlets, movable shelters, and various implements of war, will take up three whole months; and the piling up of mounds over against the walls will take three months more.

5. The general, unable to control his irritation, will launch his men to the assault like swarming ants, with the result that one-third of his men are slain, while the town still remains untaken. Such are the disastrous effects of a siege.

VI. Weak Points and Strong
1. Sun Tzu said: Whoever is first in the field and awaits the coming of the enemy, will be fresh for the fight; whoever is second in the field and has to hasten to battle will arrive exhausted.

2. Therefore the clever combatant imposes his will on the enemy, but does not allow the enemy’s will to be imposed on him.

3. By holding out advantages to him, he can cause the enemy to approach of his own accord; or, by inflicting damage, he can make it impossible for the enemy to draw near.

WILLARD is a civilian, and has, in my opinion, no real head for battle, strategy or tactics. He’d better learn. As Obama has opened his mouth, he’s created plenty of openings and avenues for WILLARD to launch major, and devastating, attacks. Sun Tzu also said that a good general makes a good strategy, and has his victory before going onto the field of battle. A bad general rushes onto the field of battle, and looks for victory there.

WILLARD has his own vulnerabilities that are glaring, but, as Sun Tzu says, regarding that:

“If your opponent is of choleric temper, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant.”

“All warfare is based on deception. Hence, when able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must seem inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near.”

Obama has even less understanding of this, than WILLARD, but WILLARD has what Obama doesn’t: the capability to understand this. I just don’t believe Obama can. Rules for Radicals is no match for the Art of War.   Saul Alinski was nothing but an America hating, sleaze-mongering leftist.  Sun Tzu was the original dirty fighter, and literally was the first one to write the book on a style of dirty fighting that is applicable to everything from personal relationships, to politics to open war.  The difference between a leftist (like Obama) and a trained, practiced Conservative is the difference between a windmill fighter and a Wing Chun Kung Fu practitioner.

Advertisements

~ by virusx on August 11, 2012.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: