If You Want it Done Right…

•April 14, 2017 • Leave a Comment

trigger warning

So I have a question for you leftists, out there:  why can’t you shut up, let the rubber hit the road, put your money where your mouths are, and lead by example?

Yep, it’s me, again.

So here’s the first question, with context.

We all know nothing makes liberals happier, than this:

Dead+baby+cake+dead+baby+cake_eebb60_5061569

That’s right:  dead babies.  Many of you are chomping at the bit at the chance to kill your own.

http://www.lifenews.com/2017/01/18/abortion-clinic-puts-up-controversial-billboard-saying-im-grateful-for-my-abortion/

And now you’re complaining about the fact that there’s a Rrepublican-led effort to de-fund unconstitutional Planned Parenthood.  (Yes, it’s unconstitutional.  There is nothing in the United States Constitution allowing the federal government to provide, or pay for, the murder of unborn children.  If there is, show me:  http://www.heritage.org/constitution/#!/)

Planned Parenthood is a White supremacist organization, created, specifically, to murder the children of non-white babies.

https://thefederalist.com/2017/04/10/planned-parenthoods-founder-original-alt-right-supremacist/

“We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population,”

http://dailysignal.com/2015/07/22/13-things-you-probably-dont-know-about-planned-parenthood-founder-margaret-sanger/

And we all know that a lot of you liberals still hate Black people, and want us exterminated from the Earth.  You know that.  We know that.

thats-racist

http://www.lifenews.com/2015/03/03/shocking-video-shows-planned-parenthood-accepting-donation-to-abort-black-babies/

Don’t worry.  This isn’t about naming you, and shaming you (though I should).  What this is about is why you’re not walking the talk (though I know most leftists don’t do that, anyway).  If you’re so up in arms about this possible (though I don’t know how probable) de-funding of Planned Parenthood, why aren’t you doing anything about it?

You idiots are still paying Barack Obama money.

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/democrats-vs-trump/obama-aligned-organizing-action-relaunches-trump-era-n719311

Organizing for America, Organizing for Action, whatever.  You’re still paying them money.

https://www.ofa.us/

obama-laughing-about-blowing-debt

You’re still dumping money into the pockets of the Slave Party, and you know they hate you people.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/dnc-black-lives-matter-memo_us_57c6f80de4b078581f1072ca

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/07/25/taco-bowl-dnc-emails-refer-hispanic-voters-latino-wikileaks/

The Socialists?  Yeah, they really care.

bernie sanders millionaire

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/reliable-source/wp/2016/08/10/bernie-sanders-buys-a-half-million-dollar-vacation-home-and-the-internet-cries-hypocrisy/?utm_term=.72f72b5d2cee

You raise money for all sorts of stupid, cockamamie causes, why don’t you raise money for this stupid, cockamamie cause?  Why don’t you totally fund Planned Parenthood, yourselves, with your own money, and cut Big Government out of the loop?

computer-crash

I know.  More than half of you just had your brains totally lock up.

Reboot your superior brains (http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2010/02/27/cnn-overnight-thread-liberals-atheists-are-smarter-than-conservatives-they-sing-better-too/) and use them, for a change.

You want government with unlimited pow-er,

but cry when it falls into the hands of someone you don’t want to have that kind of power.  (Liberal friends of mine even propose electioneering to prevent people that they don’t like from having representation in government.)

hillary-crying

Why don’t you take Planned Parenthood totally off the government dole, turn it into a publicly-traded corporation, take it world-wide, and make LOTS OF MONEY KILLING INNOCENT, UNBORN BABIES!

shut up an take my money

This way, you’d be able to get your dark works done,

and make money doing what you love.  Why is it that you feel the need to compel everybody else to pay for what you want, yet contribute very little (or nothing), yourselves?  Wouldn’t that make sense?  You wouldn’t have to worry about those world-destroying Rrepublicans, Christians, Conservatives cramping your style, and you could keep continuing your hypocritical rants about those people not caring about children, once they’re born.

So why?

Why won’t you roll up your sleeves and actually do the work, yourselves?

You’ve got plenty of Hollywood scumbags that would probably give big money to have their name carved on a stone, saying they killed kids.  George Clooney, Katy Perry, Ellen the Degenerate, Sean Pendejo, Michael Moore, Danny Glover, Barbara “Babs” Streisand, Jane Fonda, Alec Baldwin, Susan Saranwrap, Janeane Garofalo, every hag from the View, etc.  I’m sure Bill Gates and George Soros would be willing to pitch in a few pennies, too. So what’s the deal?  Why aren’t you smart leftists doing this?

gravy-train

And another thing:  if you leftists think that paying higher taxes is the pathway to solvency and prosperity, why don’t you pay them?  Why are you waiting for government mandates to pay more, when you could just pay voluntarily?  You totally wasted your money on Organizing for Whatever, so why aren’t you smart enough to put your money to “good” use, and create a higher tax base, so the government can continue turning people into wards of the state?

money-down-toilet-624x468

Hey, here’s another one for your leftists:  since you guys love welfare and other programs like that, so much, why don’t you create a welfare organization, funded by your own money?  Your money would go where you want it to go, and go to whomever you wanted it to go to, and they’d have to do whatever you wanted, or lose funding.  You could fund illegal aliens, you could fund able bodied people that just don’t want to work (like “artists”:  http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/pelosi-obamacare-allows-you-quit-your-job-and-become-whatever).  Hey, you could even give people with no health care benefits, health care benefits, through your own organization.

But, for some reason, you just don’t seem to really want these things to happen.  Sure, that would be giving into CONSERVATIVE methodology and ideologies, but it would surely benefit your agenda, right?

I am VIRUS-X, REPUBLIC COMMANDO, and I approve this message, and hope it pissed liberals off.

great-seal-of-virus-x

 

President Virus-X: the First 100 Days

•March 25, 2017 • Leave a Comment

trigger warning

So, what if the Electorate, instead of choosing NY leftist Orange Julius for president, had chosen a True Conservative for Chief Executive?  Like me, for example?  Let’s take a look at the first 100 days benchmark.

oprah fired

YOU’RE FIRED.  That’s right.  Mass terminations.  Every unconstitutional “czar” loses their job, with orders not to leave the District of Columbia.  Why?  Because I’m going to have my Department of Justice review EVERYTHING THEY’VE DONE in the event of any illegality.  If they’re broken any law that they can be punished and imprisoned for, that’s what I’m pushing for.  Time to send a big, clear message to the government ensconced New Left.  I’m also personally firing every single United States Attorney that has even craned their necks to so much as LOOK left.  If they’re not out by the C.O.B., deputy United States Marshals will assisting them in finding the door.  Needless to say, I’d be beating the bushes for Conservative attorneys to replace them, and can be trusted to do the right things in the best interests of the country.

HALT THE GRAVY TRAIN.

money-down-toilet-624x468

I fully understand that some people in this country are living in a tough spot, like below the poverty line, and that, sometimes, you just need a hand.  I understand that some people, for whatever legitimate reason, just can’t do any better.  However, unfunded liabilities have to come to an end.  Period.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2014/01/17/you-think-the-deficit-is-bad-federal-unfunded-liabilities-exceed-127-trillion/#55547a3a9bf8

unfunded liability spending

unfunded liability spending2

 

I would hold a governors conference and tell them it’s time for them to do their jobs:  take care of their own citizens, in accordance to the Constitution.  All unfunded liability spending would be coming to a complete end.  Programs like Social Security would be put where, according to the Constitution, they belong:

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” -Constitution of the United States of America; 10th Amendment

People that are above a certain age (as determined through meetings with economists, actuaries and other experts) would be allowed to “die out” of the program, but no new enrollees would be accepted.  It’s up to the People and the States to come up with alternatives.  Now, yes, communist states like NY, Hawaii and California would try sticking with government run retirement programs, and they’d probably be looking at insolvency, real quick.  So you think state governments wouldn’t do it?  Well, that’s what impeachment is for.  If your state government won’t do it’s job to help you where it should, then you start removing those people that won’t do what they said they would, and replace them with those that will.  Caveat emptor, though:  voting in tax and spend liberals will ruin your state, just like they ruined this country.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/07/08/dirty-dozen-liberal-blue-states-going-broke/

Also, all foreign aide, even to allies, comes to an end.  In it’s place will be Congressionally approved programs where they can get loans from banks.  Banks are in the business of giving out money on interest, not the United States Federal Government.  It’s high time Uncle Sugar stop irresponsibly handing out taxpayer monies for every pet project and flavor of the week.  Oh, and you know that also includes Premeditated Infanticide Planned Parenthood, right?  In all, we’re looking at a savings of trillions, annually, which can go towards legitimate ends, like PAYING OUR WAY OUT OF DEBT, ESPECIALLY TO OUR ENEMIES, LIKE THE PEOPLES’ REPUBLIC OF CHINA.

uncle same broke

We’re spending ourselves into insolvency, and this has got to stop.  NOW.

WE HAD A BAD RUN.  All unconstitutional agencies – since Congress has refused to get rid of them – will be ended by me, by ending their funding.  One of the few constitutional things Barack Obama ever did was not give allocated funding to a bureau or department that was earmarked for them (and leftists like John Conyers had a conniption about it, too).  I would do the same.  The funds can’t be spent, elsewhere, but they’re not going to keep propping up these unconstitutional agencies, many of which are out to harm the American People.

https://www.usa.gov/federal-agencies/a

You can get mad about this all you want, and think I give two shits about what you are mad about.  The Constitution prohibits them, and that’s what I’m going by.  If they means so much to you, have your state take them up (like they’ll be taking up unfunded liability programs), or fund them, yourselves, privately.  If it’s not a legitimate government function, then it goes.  That includes agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency (http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/09/us/colorado-epa-mine-river-spill/), Department of Education (http://www.westernjournalism.com/get-em-theyre-young-promoting-homosexuality-public-schools/), the Social Security Administration (http://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/terence-p-jeffrey/obama-claims-power-make-illegal-immigrants-eligible-social-security), etc.

With the shuttering of the leftist created Department of Education (founded by James Earl Carter, formerly #1 worst president evar, overtaken by Barry), that means college subsidies and grants and loans dry up, overnight.  Sorry, but the federal government isn’t in the money loaning business, constitutionally.  If that’s what you want, go to the people that do it for a living, legally:  the banks.  Schools, seeing the Big Education gravy train collide with a wall and stop, would have to quickly realize that they can’t charge the moon and stars for tuition, anymore, because Uncle Sam isn’t going to pay their ransom for college degrees.  Schools that realize this and catch on will lower their costs, and make school affordable again.  Those that don’t?:

https://cihe.neasc.org/information-public/merged-closed-or-previously-accredited-institutions

States are free to regulate the banks in their jurisdictions, and schools can have a cooperative hand in it, too, to prevent predatory lending.

WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE?  One of the hot button problems is illegal immigration.

Illegal Immigration Sign

Illegal immigration is a criminal act, and I don’t care why you did it.  You’re not American citizens, and neither are your spawn.

http://www.cnsnews.com/blog/michael-morris/levin-completely-false-children-born-illegals-have-constitutional-right

I would work with Congress on stiffening the laws against illegal immigration, criminalizing it into an E-CLASS FEDERAL FELONY.  The DOD’s (Department of Defense) NSA (National Security Agency) would turn it’s ears to the US in order to look for illegal aliens, working alongside the DHS (Department of Homeland Security).  Every illegal alien located would be subject to full surveillance, ranging from electronic to physical, and a web will be constructed to determine all others that are illegal aliens connected to the subject, and all that knew that the individual subject was an illegal alien.  When the web is large enough, each and every single person involved will be subject to mass arrest and deportation.  This includes every single member of families of illegal aliens.  Relatives that were aware of the violation of law will be subject to prosecution under federal law, and face prison time and heavy fines.  Illegal aliens not wishing permanent deportation can comply with something like this I’ll work to get through Congress:

https://virusx.wordpress.com/2013/06/21/illegal-alien-rectification-act/

So, they’ll be legal residents, but can NEVER be citizens, because their criminality for selfish reasons will not be rewarded with something as precious as American citizenship. However, if the DHS catches you, first, you get no deal.

Once caught and deported, you can’t even get so much as a green card.

Ever again.

In lieu of a costly physical wall that would not actually solve much of the problem, due to not being feasible, for a variety of reasons…

http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-wall-impossible-build-architects-2016-11

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/11/az-indian-tribe-controls-75-miles-border-wont-allow-trump-wall-land-video/

…the military would be deployed to border areas.

Yep.  That’s right.  Regular United States Army and Reserve and Guard units – especially Military Police, and some Marine Corps law enforcement, would be patrolling the border, alongside a beefed up DHS Border Patrol.

Operation Vigilant Star

They would be doing what they do best:  law enforcement.  And they would take no crap, from anyone.  That goes double for the Mexican military

http://lasvegas.cbslocal.com/2014/06/27/report-mexican-military-chopper-crosses-into-us-shoots-at-border-agents/

and criminal organizations.

http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/12/31/breaking-cartel-gunmen-fire-border-patrol-agent-arizona/

The military would have higher jurisdiction, as they would erect Bases of Operations (BASEOPS) in various places, complete with detention facilities manned by Army and Marine Corps corrections personnel, and there would be court facilities on-site, along with military judges. Illegal alien detainees would be held and processed and receive immediate court hearings (along with felony charges and a criminal record).  From there, it’s mass, regular deportation, and the host countries would take them back, or risk conflict with the US in such forms as barring from (bank) loans, cessation of any sort of DOD, DOJ or DHS assistance, and even revocation of all visas of any visiting citizens, permanently.

GET THE US OUT OF THE UN.  Yes, at long last, I would choke off all funding for the United Nations, permanently.

un building collapse

It is unconstitutional for the US to pay taxpayer monies for the United Nations, and if it isn’t, why don’t you show me where in the Constitution that it isn’t?

http://constitutionus.com/

This anti-American, anti-Israel/Jewish organization is not something the United States should be participating in, in the first place.  If nations want to deal with others, like ours, that’s why we (legitimately) pay billions of dollars to things like the US Department of State.

https://www.state.gov/

If a nation needs a go-between, they can find another nation with a similar agency.  The UN building needs to be put under a heavy, annual lease payment, and the occupants need to start paying the State of NY for their services (like police, fire, etc.), and the federal government for it’s own (like military protection).  No longer recognized, their ambassadors would no longer enjoy diplomatic immunity to prosecution in the US.  If they don’t like it, they can move to another safe nation, like France.

muslim riots in france

STOP THEFT UNDER THE GUISE OF TAXATION.  Work with Congress on a REAL tax reform, which is a return to the parameters intended by the Founders and the Framers:  no direct taxation.

“Article I, Section 8, Clause 1: The Congress shall have Power to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States.”  -Constitution of the United States of America

This means overturning the XVI Amendment.

“The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or enumeration.” -Constitution of the United States of America

With the elimination of the spending of trillions in unfunded liabilities (http://www.zerohedge.com/article/245-trillion-us-national-debt-144-trillion-unfunded-liabilities-2015) and other unconstitutional expenditures, returning to the intended, constitutional model will allow the US to have more than enough money to operate within it’s means.  This current model of confiscatory taxation is nothing but government theft, plain and simple.  It damages individuals, it destroys businesses, and it helps prevent other businesses from outside the country from coming in and taking root.

STOP LIBERALISM, EVERYWHERE YOU SEE IT.  Repeal the 17th Amendment.

The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, elected by the people thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote. The electors in each State shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the State legislatures. -17th Amendment, Constitution of the United States of America

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3034400/posts

The House of Representatives is supposed to be the direct representative of the People.

columbia

They are elected, directly, by We the People.

The President of the United States is supposed to be a representative of the Country.

uncle-sam-9644

That position is elected not by a popular vote, like a Representative, but by the Electoral College, staffed by Electors put in place by the People.

The SENATE is supposed to be a representative of the STATES, and as such, Senators are to be elected/appointed by each State’s own, individual Senate.

What we have now is just a populist system that has done the country no good.  It was a change in the Constitution that was intended as electioneering to help make sure a party was able to keep their members in power, with the popular vote.  Nothing more.  That means more Conservative states would appoint more Conservative senators, and leftist states would follow suit.  They wouldn’t be elected by mobs of leftists, out for political domination.

fighting_politicians_14

For the foreseeable future, if not indefinitely, NO MORE PRINTING MONEY.  Part of the problem behind America’s economic woes is the reduction of our currency value, thanks to presidents like Obama (and Thump wants to try it, too: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-15/trump%E2%80%99s-mandate-yellen-print-more-money-or-you%E2%80%99re-fired).  Besides eliminating unconstitutional spending, we need to rehab our currency, even if it means reducing some of what’s in circulation.  Look into the possibility of returning our money to a standard, be it gold, platinum, oil, whatever, or a combination thereof, but our money has to stand for something again.  Fiat money is worthless paper, and that’s what the Almighty Dollar is, right now.

Money-Toilet-Paper

The USD has got to be restored to it’s status as the world’s preferred currency, and the US economy has to be restored.  This is just one of many steps towards accomplishing that goal.

NO MO’ NATO.  Like it, or not, I’d eliminate our participation in NATO.  Too many countries are involved that can not contribute to the common defense pact, and thus are relying on hiding behind the US for protection.  I would negotiate individual defense pacts, with individual nations, and each would probably be different.  For instance, I would definitely want to remain in a pact with Poland, but their mutual defense pact would be different from that of England/UK.  And their’s would be different from one with France. And then there would be one with Israel.  Don’t like that I would enter one with Israel? Tough shit, haters.

Haterade

And the Israel pact would include a combined arms CSG (http://www.navy.mil/navydata/ships/carriers/powerhouse/cvbg.asp), complete with Navy, Marine Corps and Army personnel, ready to storm the beaches in defense of Israel, being just a phone call away.  If there’s another Operation:  Cast Lead (http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/operation-cast-lead), it’s going to be very different, once my ass is in the chair in the Oval Office.

We’re not entering a mutual defense pact with Turkey.  However, if forced to, it wouldn’t be anything as stringent as NATO, especially with that Satanic psycho Recep Tayyip Erdoğan running the show, over there.

erdogan-evil-eyes-copy1

https://www.thelocal.ch/20170314/turkey-hits-back-at-swiss-tabloid-for-article-calling-president-dictator

So, no, I’m not proposing we become a bunch of isolationists, like Rand Paul suggests.  I’m just saying we renegotiate our standings with every nation, and not continue with this bullshit “one size fits all” military diplomacy.

GOOD PAY, FOR GOOD WORK:  With a lot of the unconstitutional spending eliminated, military budgets can be expanded.  Working with Congress, I’d be looking to create a new pay scale for the military.  In the forces, you’re offering to die for your country.

military sacrifice

They should be paid like they are potentially sacrificing their lives for America’s freedom.  An E-1 should be getting no less than $41.6k.

Don’t like it?

tough shit2

And I’ll also include things like getting rid of the ancient M4 and M16 from the regular arsenal, for something more modern.  Possibly even eliminate the 5.56mm round from service.  National defense is a legitimate cause for federal spending and social security and welfare are not, like it, or not.

D100_8575_img masada

Then, there’s the elimination of socialist, inefficient, inhuman “medical care” from the Veterans Administration.  It’s high time this card:

20140224_VA-ID-Card-Front

meant you can go into any hospital, clinic, dental office, whatever, and get full, free-of-charge treatment and any pharmaceuticals required, all compensated for – 100% – by the United States Government, via the Veterans Administration.  No more negligent homicide of our Veterans by uncaring civilians.  If the government can, in a timely fashion, demand money from citizens and businesses, they can pay their debts, just as fast.  Veterans can find doctors they like, and they can keep them (not echoing the false promises of the idiot brothers, Obama and Thump).

trump obama trumpcare

ACTUALLY DO YOUR DAMNED JOB.  Constantly, Congress and the “Supreme” Court are overstepping the bounds of their authority.  One example has resulted in millions of deaths, thanks to Congress stupidly considering the uninformed decision of the “Supreme” Court as some kind of default “law”.  As Chief Executive, I would work to prevent that from happening, by whatever constitutional means necessary.  I would not sign unconstitutional legislation.  I would block the “Supreme” Court from hearing cases they lack the enumerated jurisdiction to hear, and ignore all past and present decisions that are not law and enshrined in the United States Constitution, including such travesties as Roe vs Wade.  I would also push for impeachment of all sitting “Supreme” Court “justices” that have rendered any unconstitutional verdicts, as well as for the impeachment of all sitting members of Congress that have done the same, regardless of how long ago it happened.

After all this, I’m sure you get my drift.  The answer to the continuing stream of woes this country faces is not the Slave Party,

democratic-party-campaign-poster

and it’s not the Rrepublican Party.

trump-electrocution

It’s Conservatism.

ice-cold-conservative

And as long as you settle for something less, that’s exactly what you’ll get.

I am VIRUS-X, REPUBLIC COMMANDO, and I approve this message.

I Have No Problem in Saying “We Told You So”.

•March 12, 2017 • Leave a Comment

trigger warning

So now republicans (small “r”, because they deserve as much respect as a pimple on an ass) are crying “irony”, because of this:

Yeah, so this left-wing jackass is whining because Rrepublicans aren’t ‘coming to the Slave Party with open arms’, begging their help in ‘fixing’ this bill that’s up for a vote, designed to pound another nail in America’s health care system.  Let’s not forget the tactics the Slave Party pulled, when they were pushing and passing ObamaCare.

Rep. Edolphus Towns (D-N.Y.) locked Republicans out of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee room to keep them from meeting when Democrats aren’t present.

Towns’ action came after repeated public ridicule from the leading Republican on the committee, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), over Towns’s failure to launch an investigation into Countrywide Mortgage’s reported sweetheart deals to VIPs.

For months Towns has refused Republican requests to subpoena records in the case. Last Thursday Committee Republicans, led by Issa, were poised to force an open vote on the subpoenas at a Committee mark-up meeting. The mark-up was abruptly canceled. Only Republicans showed up while Democrats chairs remained empty.

Republicans charged that Towns canceled the meeting to avoid the subpoena vote. Democrats first claimed the mark-up was canceled due to a conflict with the Financial Services Committee. Later they said it was abandoned after a disagreement among Democratic members on whether to subpoena records on the mortgage industry’s political contributions to Republicans.

A GOP committee staffer captured video of Democrats leaving their separate meeting in private chambers after the mark-up was supposed to have begun. He spliced the video to other footage of the Democrats’ empty chairs at the hearing room, set it to the tune of “Hit the Road, Jack” and posted it on the Oversight and Government Reform Committee’s minority webpage, where it remained as of press time.

Towns’s staffers told Republicans they were not happy about the presence of the video camera in the hearing room when they were not present. Issa’s spokesman said the Democrats readily acknowledged to Republicans that they changed the locks in retaliation to the videotape of the Democrats’ absence from the business meeting even though committee rules allow meetings to be taped.

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/63941-democrats-lock-republicans-out-of-committee-room

Then, let’s not forget this piece of left wing horse crap:

As debate over health-care reform draws to a close, Democratic leaders in the House of Representatives have indicated they may use a little-known procedural rule called “deem-and-pass” to approve health reform. While proponents maintain that “deem-and-pass” is standard legislative procedure, critics suggest that, by using the rule, Dems are trying to pass health-care reform “without [actually] voting on it.” What is “deem-and-pass,” and why are Democrats considering using it? Following, a quick guide:

What is “deem-and-pass”?
Anytime the House considers a bill, the entire body votes on a set of debate rules prior to considering the bill itself. Though “deem-and-pass” is just one of many potential rules, it comes with with a special twist: When it’s approved, the underlying piece of legislation is automatically passed.

Why use it for health-care reform?
Democrats in the House are eager to pass health-care reform, but without directly voting “yes” on the version of the bill the Senate passed in December, which many members find objectionable. They would prefer to cast their “yes” vote for a set of changes that would make that Senate bill more to their liking. That’s where “deem-and-pass” comes in: If the House approves the use of “deem-and-pass” on ObamaCare, Democrats get to skip approving the Senate bill and can jump immediately to voting on ways to (in their eyes) improve it. If the strategy is successful, those improvements will be present in the version of the bill Obama ultimately signs into law.

http://theweek.com/articles/496037/what-deemandpass

And…

House may try to pass Senate health-care bill without voting on it

After laying the groundwork for a decisive vote this week on the Senate’s health-care bill, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi suggested Monday that she might attempt to pass the measure without having members vote on it.

Instead, Pelosi (D-Calif.) would rely on a procedural sleight of hand: The House would vote on a more popular package of fixes to the Senate bill; under the House rule for that vote, passage would signify that lawmakers “deem” the health-care bill to be passed.

The tactic — known as a “self-executing rule” or a “deem and pass” — has been commonly used, although never to pass legislation as momentous as the $875 billion health-care bill. It is one of three options that Pelosi said she is considering for a late-week House vote, but she added that she prefers it because it would politically protect lawmakers who are reluctant to publicly support the measure.

“It’s more insider and process-oriented than most people want to know,” the speaker said in a roundtable discussion with bloggers Monday. “But I like it,” she said, “because people don’t have to vote on the Senate bill.”

Republicans quickly condemned the strategy, framing it as an effort to avoid responsibility for passing the legislation, and some suggested that Pelosi’s plan would be unconstitutional.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/15/AR2010031503742.html

Pardon my ignorance, but am I missing something, here?

Where, in all that, were the Slave Party nobodies running to the (Not So) Grand Ol’ Party for help in improving that unconstitutional piece of shit that they unconstitutionally passed, with the assistance of the “Supreme” Court justices that totally ignored the Constitution?  Didn’t that happen?

And, quickly, Booker runs to defend the rate/premium increases that ObamaCare exacerbated, claiming they were  happening, anyway.

Health plans sold on Michigan’s insurance exchange could see an average 17.3% increase next year, and if recent history is any guide, state regulators could approve the insurance companies’ rate hike requests without many — if any — changes.

The rate increases would mean a financial hit for taxpayers in general and the 345,000 Michiganders who buy their health insurance on the Healthcare.gov exchange, created under the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare.

http://www.freep.com/story/money/business/michigan/2016/07/30/obamacare-rates-affordable-care-act/87623260/

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/map-heres-where-obamacare-premiums-are-rising/article/2605520

Guess what, Cory.  It was the policies of your own party that you sold out to (the SLAVE PARTY) that is, in part, responsible for these outrageous rate hikes, and the NS(GOP) is an accomplice.  And, to make it worse, you Slave Party scumbags, knowing what kind of shit sandwich you created, EXEMPTED YOURSELVES, and the OBAMA FAMILY.

pics_shit-sandwich-resized_200

http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/healthcare/242140-just-wrong-congress-quietly-takes-obamacare-waiver

https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelcannon/2016/04/15/congress-is-getting-a-special-exemption-from-obamacare-and-no-its-not-legal/#6d9d2d8e7823

And, now, today, with a Rrepublican majority in both Houses of Congress and a Democratic Republican (http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Democratic_Republican_Party&redirect=no) in the White House, what do they do?

They push their own version of unconstitutional legislation, designed to further erode – if not destroy – the American health care system.

Yep, the Rrepublicans have NO INTEREST in doing what’s right.  Like Thump, they give ZERO FOXTROTS about that People, the Constitution or doing what’s right.

zero fucks

That’s right.

Thump’s reaction to the little push-back from the NS(GOP)?:

President Trump has told Republican leaders that he’s prepared to play hardball with congressional conservatives to pass the GOP healthcare bill, including by supporting the 2018 primary challengers of any Republican who votes against the bill.

Sources told the Washington Examiner that Trump made that threat in a White House meeting on Tuesday with House Majority Whip Steve Scalise, R-La., and other members of the House GOP whip team that helps line up votes.

Trump’s threat is one that could resonate. Most of the Republicans who oppose the GOP’s American Health Care Act represent ruby red districts that strongly support Trump and his agenda.

Therefore, they could be the most susceptible to a midterm primary challenge, especially if Trump tells those voters that their member of Congress is blocking him from fulfilling his promise to repeal President Obama‘s healthcare law.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/trump-threatens-gop-back-health-bill-or-get-primaried/article/2617074

trump feet to the fire

So his first impulse is to threaten all those who oppose his already imperial presidency.  Remember those promises he made about ‘draining the swamp’?  That’s precisely what he’s doing.  He’s getting rid of the swamp of people that could/would oppose him, and filling it with brown-nosed yes men, just like the ones that used to work for him.

brown noser

And what does Eddy Munster (Paul Ryan) have to say?

http://therightscoop.com/2018-will-be-a-bloodbath-if-replacement-bill-fails-paul-ryan/

paul-ryan-and-eddie-munster

Ryan says there will be a bloodbath, if they (the Rrepublicans) don’t keep their word.  Well, guess what, Eddy?  The promise was a complete repeal, not a repeal and replace with something just as bad, if not worse.   All the complaining Rrepublicans are doing about the Slave Party (and everyone else) complaining about this piece of legislation amounts to nothing.

You could’ve fought to de-fund ObamaCare.  You didn’t.

You lied and said you’d completely repeal this monstrosity.  You won’t.  Instead, you’ll just tweak it, to make it worse, then strut around telling the world how you polished a turd.

http://www.discovery.com/tv-shows/mythbusters/videos/polishing-a-turd-minimyth/

I can’t say, for sure, but it looks highly likely that a ‘bloodbath’ could very well happen, just as it did for the Slave Party, just a few years back.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/11/chambers-of-pain/507467/

The Rrepublicans could have very well handed the Slave Party exactly what they needed to turn the tables on them:

1:  A president that seems to have more of an invested interest in Twitter and intentionally making people angry, than to govern like a statesman.

trump-electrocution

Sure, he’s done some good things, but he’s looking to completely overshadow them with the bad he promised.

2:  Bad legislation that the Slave Party and the New Left can hypocritically complain about, and turn into some rallying cry.

My trumpanzee coworker said he didn’t give a fuck about what the Constitution said, and it’s very clear and apparent that his mentality is what is the norm in the Rrepublican Party.  If the (NS)GOP is pushed back into the minority (and after so short a time as the majority), then you and this Democratic Republican (http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Democratic_Republican_Party&redirect=no) “president” had better be prepared to see ‘gridlock’ that will make the Obama Regime years look like nothing.

There are constitutional solutions to this situation, but neither the Slave Party, nor the Rrepublicans are interested in the Constitution, because they are so firmly convinced that they are the law.

congress heads up asses

One of the worst things for me is that I saw all this coming, with the rest of the Conservatives.  However, you can’t talk sensibly to a trumpanzee, because, like any other liberal, they’re just incapable of seeing sense, or talking sensibly.  Common sense is not a genetic trait in the liberal, including the liberal trumpanzee.  Any trumpanzee that had it would be considered a mutant, and probably killed by his/her peers.

bad legislation

You can’t say anything critical about Thump, or else you’re a liberal…

goodfellas laughing at trump voters2

or a traitor (to someone you were never stupid enough to pledge allegiance to, in the first place).  And anything bad Thump does, even if it’s exactly something Obama did, is all A-OK.  Why?  I guess it’s only bad when a Slave Party member does it.

great-seal-of-virus-x

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trumpanzee 

•February 6, 2017 • Leave a Comment

So, since there are a lot of stupid people out there, let’s get something straight:

trum·pan·zee:  

          1:  (adj) A trump supporter/voter that mindlessly rubber-stamps everything he says and does, and has an absolute inability to think critically, or independently of him.  A person that engages in mindless Apologetics to justify Trump’s mistakes, gaffes and outright poor choices, due to their inability to deal with the fact that they backed a political candidate for the wrong reasons (“he’s not Hillary”), and that he will lie to them, constantly, because he knows they’re stupid enough to believe every word he says, or won’t speak out, if they realize he’s lying.

          2:  A racist leftist pretending to be a Conservative that supports/votes for Trump, because he/she wants a white president, after years of resentment for 2 back-to-back administrations of a half-Black president.
If you don’t fall under that category, then guess what.  Even if you did vote for Orange Julius, you’re not a trumpanzee. Congratulations.  

If you DO fall under those categories, you’re a steaming pile of money manure, and couldn’t be a Human Being, if someone gave you an instruction book.  As for “cuckservative”, that’s a racist statement (invented by trumpanzees, by the way).  Since they view Blacks as being animalistic creatures lower than they are, it brings “cuckhold” to a new low.  A “cuckhold” is a guy that gets off on watching people have sex with their wives.  A “cuckservative”, or “cuck” gets some pleasure on watching Black men have sex with their wives.  If you use that as an insult to anyone:

1:  You’re a racist, and probably wouldn’t have the guts to say that to the face of a Black guy that knows what you’re talking about.

2:  You’re probably a trumpanzee.

Herman Cain, Trumpanzee of the Day

•January 15, 2017 • 2 Comments

trigger warning

So, today, one of Thump’s most reliable trumpanzees has to throw another handful of his poo-poo…

trumpanzees

…for what he believes is a good cause.

Observe:

Trump critics still not satisfied, even as he donates all foreign hotel profits to U.S. Treasury

trump-protesters

https://www.hermancain.com/trump-critics-still-not-satisfied-even-as-he

And you know darn well they never will be.

Of all the things people said about my run for the presidency, the funniest was that I did it to make money. Get your 15 minutes of fame, build your brand, and voila! Book sales, speaking fees, etc.

Ha!

If only.

Anyone who has actually run for president can tell you that you give up a lot more than you can ever hope to get. And I didn’t spend millions of my own money like Donald Trump did.

Trump isn’t done giving up his money either. He announced last week that not only will he turn over control of his business enterprise to his sons and a longtime colleague, but get this: Trump intends to donate all hotel profits that come from foreign payments to the U.S. Treasury.

You realize, of course, that he is under no obligation to do any of this. He doesn’t have to give up his business interests. He doesn’t have to give up the money they make. They’re his, after all, and he built them. There is no law that says that, upon becoming president, you have to give all that up.

Or give any of it up.

Trump is choosing to do so, I think, mainly to avoid any appearance of a conflict. There may be some real conflicts, like the fact that the federal government leases some space in Trump Tower. That makes Trump his own landlord. It’s nothing on the order of politicians taking campaign contributions from public employee unions and then rewarding them with fat contracts at taxpayer expense. But it’s something, and it’s wise for Trump to let someone else handle the leasing decisions for as long as he’s president.

Still, he didn’t have to do it, and he certainly doesn’t have to take the extraordinary step of donating all hotel profits that come from foreign payments to the Treasury.

So you’d think that, having gone above and beyond anything that’s required of him, Trump would have mollified his critics and gotten them to stop yelping about his supposed conflicts of interest.

But you’d be wrong! Of course they haven’t stopped yelping!

Time Magazine is sadly typical of the whiny complainers who demand he completely divest of his entire business enterprise. That’s simply insane. For one thing, it’s not that easy to do. For another thing, if you immediately liquidate all your business holdings, you’re almost certainly not going to get full value in cash. That means that after all the years you spend building these businesses, you now have to give up realizing their true value.

Why would you do that? No one with a brain would. But the political class seems to think that business profits are evil, and that if a president is realizing profits from any business while he’s in office, that somehow puts him at odds with the best interests of the American people.

I’m sure Trump realized his critics would never be satisfied, no matter what he did. But what he’s done is beyond anything that could or should have been asked of him, and it speaks to his seriousness in embracing the presidency and turning the problems of this nation around.

And I know he isn’t doing it for gratitude, and that’s a good thing. Because while some people will surely thank him for the hard work he’s going to do, it’s clear he’s going to get a lot more grief than gratitude – at least from the people who yell the loudest.

I’ve had about enough of listening to them.

Get your copy of Herman Cain’s new book, The Right Problems Solutions, here!

Notice that he dishonestly portrays all “Thump critics” as unwashed leftists in that picture.  He is a trumpanzee.  His main interest is [political] party and defending Cheeto Jesus.
trump-cheeto-jesus

Thump could’ve eliminated conflicts of interest a while ago, by turning a lot of his holdings over to his children…

trump-family-american-horror-story

In any event, Cain is acting like Thump is something special, and that he’s making some special sacrifice for the country, just because he’s one of the richer richies that ever became president.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States_by_net_worth

For one:  Thump took the job after his monumentally dishonest campaign for it.  Obama whined like a girl for quite a few months after becoming president, too, and Conservatives (and a handful of republicans) gave him the same answer.  He campaigned for it.  If he didn’t want to make the sacrifices, he was more than able to not take the job, and not even campaign for it.  I’m sure Thump can set up blind trusts, just like his buddy Obama did, so he can keep collecting money from his little real estate empire, and continue to be rich. Once this is over, guess what Herman Cain?  Thump will still be rich.  Richer, in fact, because he’ll have been accumulating money.  The profits of his hotels aren’t his only sources of income, in case you’re not aware of that.

For two:   Why, exactly, am I supposed to be impressed, by this?  This is OK, but doesn’t just absolve him of everything else he’s said and done. Plus, after stealing money from Veterans, after lying about that and how much he claimed to love them, why couldn’t he donate that to Veterans?

http://www.redstate.com/jaycaruso/2016/02/14/donald-trump-veterans-groups-waiting/

http://poorrichardsnews.com/trumps-fundraising-for-veterans-actually-went-to-his-personal-foundation-which-previously-gave-to-the-clintons/

Or pro-life causes?

http://www.lifenews.com/2016/03/01/donald-trump-praises-planned-parenthood-again-attacks-so-called-conservatives-who-disagree/

Why not to foster children?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/17/AR2007101700966.html

Disadvantaged schools?

https://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/more-40-low-income-schools-dont-get-fair-share-state-and-local-funds-department-

How about to universities and community colleges, as a general availability scholarship?

http://www.forbes.com/sites/steveodland/2012/03/24/college-costs-are-soaring/#106ec8a7641b

Maybe Thump will do some of these thing, but look at what kind of guy he is.  He says on thing, does another.  Or he’ll say several things, mean none.

And let’s not forget Thump’s usual pattern.

trump-fakes-right-moves-left

Herman Cain is a guy I’ve lost a lot of respect for, and this just makes it worse.  Not all people critical of Thump are these unwashed leftists.  On the contrary; Thump supporters/trumpanzees are the leftists.  People like Herman Cain are supporting with their votes a guy that praised an organization that literally profits off the murder of unborn children…

http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/25/politics/donald-trump-defends-planned-parenthood-republican-debate/

http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2015/09/disentangling-the-data-on-planned-parenthood-affiliates-abortion-services-and-receipt-of-taxpayer-funding

…advocates for economy destroying socialist/communist medical practices, where the federal government illegally, unconstitutionally and unethically moves even deeper into the doctor-patient relationship, so as to take control over both sides…

…something that even Obama was afraid to push.

…advocates job destroying policies that are both unconstitutional and antithetical to this constitutional republic…

http://www.redstate.com/patterico/2016/11/11/trumps-jobs-destroying-yes-jobs-destroying-infrastructure-program/

http://therightscoop.com/facepalm-trump-is-now-blatantly-advocating-america-killing-democratic-policies/

and has a problem condemning the Ku Klux Klan, for some reason.

In true trumpanee fashion, the mentally dishonest Herman Cain refuses to make distinctions between leftists that dislike Trump, just because he’s a republican and not the other liberal they voted for, and those that are actually principled Conservatives, who take issues with Trump’s abrasive, grating personality as well as his leftist politics.  I guess Herman Cain would count William F. Buckley, Senior in this skewed, utterly disingenuous picture, as well, in his childish attempt to vilify any and all critics of Thump.

Why?

Because he was prescient enough to see what Thump really was, almost 20 years ago.

“Look for the narcissist. The most obvious target in today’s lineup is, of course, Donald Trump. When he looks at a glass, he is mesmerized by its reflection. If Donald Trump were shaped a little differently, he would compete for Miss America. But whatever the depths of self-enchantment, the demagogue has to say something. So what does Trump say? That he is a successful businessman and that that is what America needs in the Oval Office. There is some plausibility in this, though not much. The greatest deeds of American Presidents — midwifing the new republic; freeing the slaves; harnessing the energies and vision needed to win the Cold War — had little to do with a bottom line.”

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/430187/william-f-buckley-donald-trump-demagoguery-cigar-aficionado

This is, quite obviously, something Herman Cain and the rest of the trumpanzees are totally unable to cope with hearing/reading, which means they’d not like Teddy Roosevelt, either.  Why?  Because he probably wouldn’t be a big ban of a Thump.

teddy-roosevelt

“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

― Theodore Roosevelt

So how does Herman Cain and the rest of the trumpanzees react to criticism of Thump?

trigger

No different from any other liberal, when they don’t get their way, or you threaten their way of life and thinking.  They can’t take it, when someone calls out their false god on things he’s really done, and presents legitimate criticism.

trump-scooby

No, he has to be lumped in with the liberals, which, ironically, includes all trumpanzees, even though their either too stupid to know it, or just won’t admit it.

I am VIRUS-X, REPUBLIC COMMANDO, and I approve this message.  If you trumpanzees don’t, that’s just tough shit.

great-seal-of-virus-x

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Crybabies

•December 28, 2016 • Leave a Comment

trigger warning

So, the cavalcade of crybabies continues.

symbol-of-the-democrat-party

 

For weeks, leftists have been doing the dumbest things, showing how “triggered” they are that they lost the election (i.e.:  didn’t get their way).

Oh, and please forgive the White Supremacist icon (Pepe the Frog) in the video.

In any event, they’re also resorting to outright criminality.

Crowds of angry protesters have taken to streets across the United States chanting “Not Our President” while setting fires and smashing windows.

Hundreds of people descended on California minutes after it was announced that Donald Trump had won the election.

Hillary Clinton supporters were filmed setting fire to the US flag while marching through the streets of Portland, Oregon, shouting “F*** Donald Trump”.

Footage also emerged of activists setting tyres and rubbish bins on fire, blocking main roads and lighting flares.

People also burned an effigy of the President-elect, who will be officially sworn into office in January.

http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/liberal-riots-trump-destroys-hillary-clinton/#ixzz4U9Y5fn00

Hey, uh, could somebody remind me where I can find the stories about Conservatives and republicans (still small “r”, because I have no respect for them) after the Slave Party won the elections, back in 2k8 and 2k12?  Or when they were burning Obama in effigy?   Make no mistake:  if I was governor of any of the states where you people were rioting, you’d be facing down with the Army National Guard Military Police and the K-9s.

mp-tactical

One look at them, and you’d get the worst case of the puckers you’ll ever have for the rest of your lives.

Leftists (like some of you reading this) are pretty intellectually limited, and don’t have much effective ammunition.  After a very short time, your only ammunition is to call someone a “racist” (and never mind the fact that you’re a leftist, and probably a member of the Slave Party, or some other party that is friendly with the Slave Party).

I’m pretty sure a lot of those rioting are Blacks and Latinos.

Where are the condemnations of their racism?

thats-racist

So, instead of admitting that the Slave Party nominated absolute turds for candidates

bernie-hillary-2016

that failed to meet the challenge of the absolute turd the GOP put up,

trump-dt

how do leftists react?

trigger

Then, you have this:

Donald Trump wants yuge celebrities to perform at his presidential inaugural events next month. In fact, Trump’s former campaign manager and now adviser Kellyanne Conway even made a plea on national TV a few weeks ago, asking Justin Timberlake and Bruno Mars to call her to be part of the festivities. This week it was announced that the Radio City Rockettes will perform (though there are reports some are reluctant).

As of now, none of the big name A-list celebrities are biting. And that’s a great thing.
Celebrities shouldn’t lend their fame to normalize or validate Trump’s history of racism, bigotry and sexism. And by being a part of his inauguration they would be doing just that.
They would be saying it’s OK Trump demonized Latinos, Muslims and immigrants.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/21/opinions/why-celebrities-skip-trump-inauguration-festivities-obeidallah/

“Trump’s history of racism?”  Yeah, he definitely has one, but, what about this:

So, while far leftist psycho Cenk Uygur does admit that Clinton did show here racist flag, he tried covering for her by saying she borrowed it from the republicans (yet, mysteriously, refuses to authenticate that by showing video or transcript of it happening). And, really, why did he do this?  Because he wasn’t voting for Hillary Clinton, that’s why.

bernie sanders racism

And the leftists behind Wikileaks (which could actually be a front for Russian intelligence: http://thefederalist.com/2016/09/09/julian-assange-is-a-russian-front-man-not-a-freedom-fighter/)

Conservatives preach inclusion and judging people on character. Democrats, not so much. For Democrats, people are placed in buckets. People are identifiable and brandable. The irony being that Democrats say they don’t “profile.” So what is “taco bowl engagement?”

The recent WikiLeaks showcased how the Democrats “branded” Latinos. You can bet they have the same {ahem} profiles for blacks, Asians, and so on. And these profiles serve one purpose: figure out how to trick hapless rubes to vote for Democrats.

We see in this leaked email how Democrats see Mexicans as “tacos.”

http://theblacksphere.net/2016/07/mexicans-can-attend-dnc-taco-bowl/

Oh, and let’s not forget other things the Media Army of the LEC (Liberal Entertainment Complex) don’t bring up about the Clintons:

Has anyone asked Hillary Clinton if the segregationist and anti-Semite J. William Fulbright was “deplorable?” Seems like a reasonable question, since we’re playing this game. After all, her name is on the prestigious J. William Fulbright-Hillary Rodham Clinton Public Policy Fellowship.

Fulbright wasn’t just a nut with despicable ideas about minorities. He was gifted, influential politician who for decades worked to keep the races segregated through state force. He signed the Southern Manifesto (he helped edit it, actually), opposed Brown v. Board, filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and voted against the 1965 Voting Rights Act. He even voted against Hawaiian statehood to keep its large non-white population out of the union.

Before leaving the spotlight, Fulbright took up another fight, going on national television in 1973 to warn Americans about the nefarious “Jewish influence” in Congress.

The Clintons have honored this man’s political legacy for a long time. The State Department only added Hillary’s name to the fellowship in 2013. Apply, and you too can help “strengthen the public sector” in other countries.

The rapidity and effectiveness in which Democrats have turned attention from Hillary’s assorted lies and corruption to Trump’s birtherism has been impressive. Of course, it’s wholly Trump’s fault that such a pivot is even possible. When you spend years peddling idiotic conspiracy theories about the president’s birth, you’ve not only proven that you’re unfit for office but that you’re probably a racist, as well.

http://thefederalist.com/2016/09/19/why-is-hillary-clinton-still-honoring-a-segregationist-and-anti-semite/

Something tells me he wasn’t a fan of Latinos, Arabs, Blacks or any other immigrants, either.

However, the LEC lets her get away with that, and provides her cover, by not bringing it up to the stupid people that vote for her, mindlessly, and have no mental capacity to do even routine investigation into her background, and her true motives.

So, now, we’re at the present (2016/12/28), and this announcement comes up:

While his name isn’t technically given, the likeness and Twitter style of U.S. President-Elect Donald Trump appears in today’s issue of Dark Knight III: The Master Race.

“Trump,” who has been spotted in the “talking heads” segments in previous issues, boasts that he predicted mankind’s victory over Kryptonian invaders, and promises to make the Kryptonians pay to rebuild Gotham City:

donald-trump-tweet-dark-knight-iii-221388

It’s difficult to get a handle on the political commentary here: Miller has been an outspoken conservative on many subjects in recent years, so it would be easy to see him as a Trump supporter. It’s most likely that the satire here is more bomb-throwing and anti-authoritarian: Both Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush, who were Presidents during The Dark Knight Returns and The Dark Knight Strikes Again, were satirized in those books, and even if he hadn’t won the election (it would be difficult to imagine this comic was completed that far in advance), an over-the-top persona like Trump’s would continue to be easy to mimic and to mine for humor.

All that said, it will likely be taken as a jab at the President-Elect, particularly since the image of the tweet is superimposed over the “win” — a city in ruins and in flames.

The fact that Trump — addicted as he seems to be to social media — won the election works out nicely for the way Miller was delivering some of the broader cultural commentary in the series, as it pertains to the “talking heads” segments that had been a part of the previous installments in the Dark Knight series.

“When I wrote old Spider-Man comics, I’d use newspapers. I’d use The Daily Bugle, for instance,” co-writer and series creator Frank Miller told ComicBook.com. “When I started to write The Dark Knight Returns, I switched over to television, and now the switch has gone over to a more Internet news service. I think that as our communications vehicles change, we’re bound to change the way they’re represented in our comic books.”

Dark Knight III: The Master Race #7 is in stores now. You can get a copy at your local comic shop or pick it up digitally on ComiXology.

http://comicbook.com/2016/12/28/donald-trump-goes-to-war-with-krypton-in-dark-knight-iii-the-mas/

What are Miller’s true motives for this?  Unknown.  Possibly money, or, maybe he just isn’t a Thump fan (like I’m certainly not).  However, leftist motivations for promoting and buying this are pretty transparent.

shut up an take my money

They’ve infected comics with their poisonous ideologies for decades (and, pretty much, everything else they touch)

http://thefederalist.com/2015/10/21/its-true-captain-america-is-now-captain-leftist/

http://www.dailywire.com/news/7385/liberals-ruin-everything-gay-star-trek-feminist-john-nolte

http://therightscoop.com/ugh-marvels-captain-america-beats-up-conservatives-in-new-comic-book-series/

http://whycomicbookssuck.blogspot.com/

Am I saying Thump isn’t a terrible cartoon character?

simpsons-trump

Certainly not.

However, what I am saying is that this is yet another example of leftists talking out of both sides of their forked-tongue having mouths.

On the one hand, for years, they were caterwauling that Conservatives and republicans should give Obama a chance, let him do his job, stop obstructing him by refusing unconstitutional and illegal actions, be good to him, rub his back, kiss his ring, kiss his ass, suck his toes, etc.  That the biggest obstructions to peace and “progressiveness” were the people that didn’t vote for Obama, and refused to cash in their values and morals, just to go along to get along.

Oh, and in case you’re too dumb to understand, and too lazy to look it up, for yourself:

caterwaul

In fact, here’s a liberal in action, caterwauling:

There.

Now, you know what you look at sound like.  Unfortunately, lacking in self awareness like you do, you’re too dumb to realize how STUPID it makes you look.

Now, when you have the chance to put your sophistry into action, when you have the chance to show everybody what you meant by giving people a chance, what do you do?

Actually, I take it back.

Liberal are showing exactly what they meant by their empty words like “tolerance” and giving people a chance, harmony, etc.

Again, liberals, while I’m CERTAINLY not here to defend an ass like Thump, I am also CERTAINLY not going to let you get away with this bullshit.  You use comics to indoctrinate children into your poisonous mindsets.

http://www.bleedingcool.com/2012/01/05/how-liberalism-may-be-hurting-comic-book-sales-by-darin-wagner/

You pepper movies and television with your lies. Then, every time something happens, “it’s the republicans’ fault”, and “the republicans and the Slave Party (https://kdentify.wordpress.com/texas-am-university-commerce-academics/rhetoric-race-and-the-digital-humanities-2/the-southern-manifesto-text-and-signatories/) switched sides”.

Own it.

You’re lying, good-for-nothing crybabies that even want to engage in unconstitutional, un-American ELECTIONEERING to insure that nobody that thinks like you can ever be represented in this country’s government, ever again.

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/presidential-campaign/306350-sudden-liberal-opposition-to-electoral-college-not

http://txvalues.org/2013/07/25/san-antonio-looks-to-ban-christians-from-city-government/

Liberals don’t like what people like Ben Franklin gave us:

There is a story, often told, that upon exiting the Constitutional Convention Benjamin Franklin was approached by a group of citizens asking what sort of government the delegates had created. His answer was: “A republic, if you can keep it.”

http://constitutioncenter.org/learn/educational-resources/historical-documents/perspectives-on-the-constitution-a-republic-if-you-can-keep-it

They insist on believing, and lie to themselves and others that will listen to their lies, that this is a democracy.

“I do not say that democracy has been more pernicious on the whole, and in the long run, than monarchy or aristocracy. Democracy has never been and never can be so durable as aristocracy or monarchy; but while it lasts, it is more bloody than either. … Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide. It is in vain to say that democracy is less vain, less proud, less selfish, less ambitious, or less avaricious than aristocracy or monarchy. It is not true, in fact, and nowhere appears in history. Those passions are the same in all men, under all forms of simple government, and when unchecked, produce the same effects of fraud, violence, and cruelty. When clear prospects are opened before vanity, pride, avarice, or ambition, for their easy gratification, it is hard for the most considerate philosophers and the most conscientious moralists to resist the temptation. Individuals have conquered themselves. Nations and large bodies of men, never.” -President John Adams

“Democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts and murders itself. There was never a democracy that did not commit suicide.” -Samuel Adams

However, seeing as to how you leftists are so into murder (politicians and clergy that you don’t like, unborn children, etc.), I guess, in your eyes, that wouldn’t be such a bad thing.

“Real liberty is neither found in despotism or the extremes of democracy, but in moderate governments.” -Alexander Hamilton

“Democracy will soon degenerate into an anarchy; such an anarchy that every man will do what is right in his own eyes and no man’s life or property or reputation or liberty will be secure, and every one of these will soon mould itself into a system of subordination of all the moral virtues and intellectual abilities, all the powers of wealth, beauty, wit, and science, to the wanton pleasures, the capricious will, and the execrable cruelty of one or a very few.”
— John Adams, An Essay on Man’s Lust for Power (1763)

Liberals, generally, are people that don’t believe in God, but love playing Him, and their heart’s desire is to remake America in their own image.  Part is this War on Reality is the battle to corrupt the hearts and minds of the young and impressionable, and one of their greatest weapons is the culture, under which comic books are included.

I am VIRUS-X, REPUBLIC COMMANDO, and I approve this message.  If you don’t, TOUGH SHIT.

great-seal-of-virus-x

 

 

 

 

 

But He Isn’t Even in Office, Yet! Give Him a Chance!

•November 24, 2016 • Leave a Comment

trigger warning

trigger

“A lot of people believe the Department of Education should just be eliminated. Get rid of it. If we don’t eliminate it completely, we certainly need to cut its power and reach. Education has to be run locally. Common Core, No Child Left Behind, and Race to the Top are all programs that take decisions away from parents and local school boards. These programs allow the progressives in the Department of Education to indoctrinate, not educate, our kids. What they are doing does not fit the American model of governance.”

“I am totally against these programs and the Department of Education. It’s a disaster. We cannot continue to fail our children–the very future of this nation.”
Source: Crippled America, by Donald Trump, p. 50-1 Nov 3, 2015

trump-i-didnt-say-that

Congratulations, trumpanzees!  You supported a guy that claims he never lies.

“So while sometimes I can be too honest, Hillary Clinton is the exact opposite: She never tells the truth,” Trump said. “In this journey, I will never lie to you. I will never tell you something I do not believe.”

http://www.trunews.com/article/donald-trump-i-will-never-lie-to-you#sthash.fCGjQdCG.dpuf

And before he even gets into the White House, what has he been doing?

LYING!

He lied about prosecuting Hillary Clinton.

Then:

Now:

http://therightscoop.com/dont-want-hurt-trump-now-going-soft-investigating-hillary/

shocked face

It is the natural reaction of the trumpanzee to try to justify everything that Thump does, including when he lies to them, and we know that Thump lies a lot.

picard-trump-liar

Just like his BFF, Hillary, whom he’s protecting from prosecution and justice.

trump-protect-hillary-from-prosecution

Now, he’s come out with another lie.  After all his criticism of the Department of Education, what does he do?  He appoints a new bureaucrat to run it…

http://therightscoop.com/trump-picks-betsy-devos-secretary-education-charter-school-haters-hardest-hit/

…and he picks a leftist Common Core lover, as well.

Well, there you have it folks. Trump has just picked his education secretary after narrowing down his choices to two pro-Common Core, pro-micromanaging women: Michelle Rhee and Betsy DeVos. I’ve already discussed what a terrible pick Rhee would have been, but DeVos is no better. DeVos fails on two key promises Trump repeatedly made to voters: “Get rid of Common Core” and “keep education local.” – Take a closer look at this stuff at: https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2016/11/betsy-devos-as-education-secretary-what-you-need-to-know-about-trumps-pick#sthash.zNColNFF.dpuf

Like Rhee, DeVos has adamantly supported Common Core. She’s even a board member of Jeb Bush’s Common Core-supporting education foundation (and one of its biggest donors), not to mention “closely aligned to Republican education officials like Sen. Lamar Alexander” — which should give any education freedom lover convulsions. Alexander, R-Tenn. (F, 15%), of course, is the same guy who promised he was “ending the national school board” by rushing a huge federal education bill into law this spring that gives the U.S. education secretary direct, “mother, may I” control over what kids learn and when. In short, these are a bunch of nanny statists who may promise “local control” and a love for kids, but whose every effort is directed in the opposite direction.

Hensley-Clancy writes that DeVos now claims to be against Common Core, of all things! That’s sure news to all the grassroots folks she pit her big money against during their legislative battles to reject Common Core. Grassroots folks report to me that DeVos’ husband personally called state senators in Michigan to get them to vote against a Common Core repeal bill. DeVos’ American Federation for Children also contributed huge sums of money for state school board races in Alabama on the side of Common Core supporters trying to oust Common Core opponents

https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2016/11/betsy-devos-as-education-secretary-what-you-need-to-know-about-trumps-pick#sthash.zNColNFF.dpuf

trump-lying-asshole

Thump has lied at every turn, and many of his lies are already coming to the fore, and he hasn’t even gotten his fat, orange ass in the seat, yet.

“A lot of people believe the Department of Education should just be eliminated. Get rid of it. If we don’t eliminate it completely, we certainly need to cut its power and reach. Education has to be run locally. Common Core, No Child Left Behind, and Race to the Top are all programs that take decisions away from parents and local school boards. These programs allow the progressives in the Department of Education to indoctrinate, not educate, our kids. What they are doing does not fit the American model of governance.”

“I am totally against these programs and the Department of Education. It’s a disaster.D We cannot continue to fail our children–the very future of this nation.”
Source: Crippled America, by Donald Trump, p. 50-1 Nov 3, 2015

Out of his own (probably ghost written) book (that he probably didn’t write, because he couldn’t string a coherent sentence together to save his own worthless life), he claims to be against federal education initiatives, the Department of Education as a whole, and Common Core, by name, and yet what does he do? Appoint a new bureaucrat to an unconstitutional agency that he claims to dislike, and appoint a leftist, indoctrinista, on top of everything else. *%^% Thump.

trump-big-liar

 

Trumpanzees, everywhere, are still screeching “give Thump a chance, he hasn’t even gotten in office, yet!”  No, I won’t.  He hasn’t even gotten into office, yet, and he’s already laughing in your faces, telling you that he’s lied about everything the Conservatives said he did.

clintons-laughing-at-prosecution

I am VIRUS-X, REPUBLIC COMMANDO, and I approve this message.

great-seal-of-virus-x